Publications

Detailed Information

Anterior Dental Implant in Grafted Cleft Alveolus: A Clinical Comparison Between Intramembranous and Endochondral Bone Graft

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Authors

Sodnom-Ish, Buyanbileg; Eo, Mi Young; Park, Min Woo; Lee, Ju Young; Seo, Mi Hyun; Yang, Hoon Joo; Kim, Soung Min

Issue Date
2023-05
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ltd.
Citation
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, Vol.34 No.3, pp.916-921
Abstract
Background: Alveolar bone graft is usually performed during the early mixed dentition phase, at the chronological age of 6 to 8 years old, to reconstruct the cleft alveolus. As the appropriate time for implant placement is after completion of full growth, it can result in a likelihood of resorption. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of anterior dental implants with delayed bone grafting using iliac crest (endochondral) and mandibular ramus or symphysis (intramembranous) bone in adolescents to adulthood patients with cleft alveolus. Materials and Methods: This study included 10 patients with cleft alveolus who underwent delayed bone grafting with autogenous block bone and particulate cancellous bone and marrow (PCBM) from the mandibular ramus and symphysis with dental implant placement, and iliac crest. The success of the treatment was evaluated through clinical and radiographic examination including marginal bone loss measurement of the implants. Results: All patients underwent delayed bone grafting between the ages of 11 and 21.1 years (mean age: 15.1±4.3 y). The implant diameters ranged from 3.8 to 4.5 mm and the lengths ranged from 8.0 to 11.5 mm. All of the implants were integrated successfully and survived during the 3-year follow-up period. Conclusions: Delayed bone grafting followed by implant placement showed long-term stability with satisfactory esthetic and functional rehabilitation. One of the main advantages of delayed bone grafting is to achieve adequate bone support for future dental implant placements with less bone resorption compared with those of primary, early secondary, and secondary bone grafting.
ISSN
1049-2275
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/205278
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000009127
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:

Related Researcher

  • School of Dentistry
  • Department of Dentistry
Research Area Dental implant related bony regeneration, Facial reconstruction, bioactive membrane & E-beam irradiation, 상악동 및 타액선 외과술, 임플란트 골재생술, 턱얼굴 미세수술재건

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share