Publications

Detailed Information

Value of a deep learning-based algorithm for detecting Lung-RADS category 4 nodules on chest radiographs in a health checkup population: estimation of the sample size for a randomized controlled trial

Cited 1 time in Web of Science Cited 2 time in Scopus
Authors

Nam, Ju Gang; Kim, Hyun Jin; Lee, Eun Hee; Hong, Wonju; Park, Jongsoo; Hwang, Eui Jin; Park, Chang Min; Goo, Jin Mo

Issue Date
2022-01-01
Publisher
Springer Verlag
Citation
European Radiology, Vol.32 No.1, pp.213-222
Abstract
Objective To explore the value of a deep learning-based algorithm in detecting Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System category 4 nodules on chest radiographs from an asymptomatic health checkup population. Methods Data from an annual retrospective cohort of individuals who underwent chest radiographs for health checkup purposes and chest CT scanning within 3 months were collected. Among 3073 individuals, 118 with category 4 nodules on CT were selected. A reader performance test was performed using those 118 radiographs and randomly selected 51 individuals without any nodules. Four radiologists independently evaluated the radiographs without and with the results of the algorithm; and sensitivities/specificities were compared. The sample size needed to confirm the difference in detection rates was calculated, i.e., the number of true-positive radiographs divided by the total number of radiographs. Results The sensitivity of the radiologists substantially increased aided by the algorithm (38.8% [183/472] to 45.1% [213/472]; p < .001) without significant change in specificity (94.1% [192/204] vs. 92.2% [188/204]; p = .22). Pooled radiologists detected more nodules with the algorithm (32.0% [156/488] vs. 38.9% [190/488]; p < .001), without alteration of false-positive rates (0.09 [62/676], both). Pooled detection rates for the annual cohort were 1.49% (183/12,292) and 1.73% (213/12,292) without and with the algorithm, respectively. A sample size of 41,776 in each arm would be required to demonstrate significant detection rate difference with < 5% type I error and > 80% power. Conclusion Although readers substantially increased sensitivity in detecting nodules on chest radiographs from a health checkup population aided by the algorithm, detection rate difference was only 0.24%, requiring a sample size >80,000 for a randomized controlled trial.
ISSN
0938-7994
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/208870
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08162-8
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:

Related Researcher

  • College of Medicine
  • Department of Medicine
Research Area Radiology

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share