Browse

Removal of the laryngeal tube in children: anaesthetized compared with awake

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, J.-
dc.contributor.authorKim, J.-
dc.contributor.authorKim, S.-
dc.contributor.authorKim, C.-
dc.contributor.authorYoon, T.-
dc.contributor.authorKim, H.-
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-29T01:09:21Z-
dc.date.available2009-12-29T01:09:21Z-
dc.date.issued2007-04-10-
dc.identifier.citationBr J Anaesth. 2007 Jun;98(6):802-5. Epub 2007 Apr 7.en
dc.identifier.issn0007-0912 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17416908-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10371/22923-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Laryngeal tube (LT) is a useful airway device in children, but there is no objective evidence that removal of LT in awake state is better than in anaesthetized state. So, we compared the incidence of respiratory adverse events after the removal of LT, either under anaesthesia or on awakening. METHODS: Seventy healthy children between 1 and 12 yr of age were enrolled in this study. Anaesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane. After induction of anaesthesia, patients were randomized into two groups: removal of LT in anaesthetized state (Group A: 2% sevoflurane) and in awake state (Group B). During and within 1 min of the removal of LT, airway complications such as upper airway obstruction, cough, vomiting, teeth clenching, hypersalivation, desaturation <90%, and laryngospasm were recorded. RESULTS: Cough (37.1 vs 2.9%), hypersalivation (28.6 vs 5.7%), desaturation (20 vs 0%), and LT dislocation during emergence relating to the patient's movement (26.5 vs 0%) occurred more frequently in Group B (P < 0.05). Upper airway obstruction occurred more frequently (68.6 vs 31.4%) in Group A, and it was easily resolved by chin or jaw lifting. CONCLUSION: LT removal in anaesthetized state reduced cough, hypersalivation, and prevented tube displacement and hypoxia. Upper airway obstruction in the anaesthetized state should be predicted and managed with chin or jaw lifting.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.subjectAirway Obstruction/*etiology/prevention & controlen
dc.subjectAnesthesia, Inhalation/*methodsen
dc.subjectAnesthetics, Inhalationen
dc.subjectAwarenessen
dc.subjectChilden
dc.subjectChild, Preschoolen
dc.subjectCough/etiology/prevention & controlen
dc.subjectDevice Removal/*adverse effects/methodsen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectInfanten
dc.subject*Laryngeal Masksen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectMethyl Ethersen
dc.subjectPostoperative Nausea and Vomiting/etiology/prevention & controlen
dc.subjectSialorrhea/etiology/prevention & controlen
dc.titleRemoval of the laryngeal tube in children: anaesthetized compared with awakeen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bja/aem070-
Appears in Collections:
College of Medicine/School of Medicine (의과대학/대학원)Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (마취통증의학전공)Journal Papers (저널논문_마취통증의학전공)
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse