Publications

Detailed Information

Clinical outcomes of tubal heterotopic pregnancy: assisted vs. spontaneous conceptions

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorHan, Sang Hoon-
dc.contributor.authorJee, Byung Chul-
dc.contributor.authorSuh, Chang Suk-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Seok Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Young Min-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jung Gu-
dc.contributor.authorMoon, Shin Yong-
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-19T14:14:15Z-
dc.date.available2010-01-19T14:14:15Z-
dc.date.issued2007-01-30-
dc.identifier.citationGynecol Obstet Invest. 2007;64(1):49-54. Epub 2007 Jan 25.en
dc.identifier.issn1423-002X (Electronic)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17259714-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/38228-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: It has not been established whether the clinical outcomes of tubal heterotopic pregnancy resulting from assisted conception are different to those of spontaneous conception. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical course and the outcome of intrauterine gestation following surgical treatment for tubal heterotopic pregnancy according to the method of pregnancy. METHODS: Medical records of 13 cases of tubal heterotopic pregnancy experienced in Seoul National University Hospital during 1990-2004 and 30 case reports of tubal heterotopic pregnancy published in the Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology during 1980-2004 were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical outcomes were compared between the assisted (n = 23) and spontaneous conception groups (n = 20). RESULTS: The assisted conception group had a significantly higher preoperative systolic blood pressure and a previous history of pelvic pathology. The spontaneous group had a higher incidence of tubal rupture and hemoperitoneum. The assisted conception group had a higher live birth rate than the spontaneous group (47.8 vs. 20%, p = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: In tubal heterotopic pregnancy, the assisted conception group had a more favorable clinical course and intrauterine gestation outcome following surgical treatment when compared with the spontaneous conception group.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherKargeren
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectCohort Studiesen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectFertilization/*physiologyen
dc.subjectFertilization in Vitro/*methodsen
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studiesen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectInfant Mortality/trendsen
dc.subjectInfant, Newbornen
dc.subjectMaternal Ageen
dc.subjectPregnancyen
dc.subjectPregnancy, Tubal/*physiopathology/ultrasonographyen
dc.subjectRetrospective Studiesen
dc.subjectRisk Assessmenten
dc.subjectUltrasonography, Prenatalen
dc.subjectPregnancy Outcome-
dc.subjectPregnancy, Multiple-
dc.titleClinical outcomes of tubal heterotopic pregnancy: assisted vs. spontaneous conceptionsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor한상훈-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor지병철-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor서창석-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김석현-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최영민-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김정구-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor문신용-
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000099014-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share