Browse

The Problem of Scientific Progress and Major Schools of Thought in Contemporary International Politics Theory

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPark, Hun Joo-
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-28-
dc.date.available2010-01-28-
dc.date.issued1998-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of International and Area Studies, Vol.5 No.1, pp. 1-20-
dc.identifier.issn1226-8550-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/45961-
dc.description.abstractThis article represents a preliminary attempt at evaluating major theories of or approaches to international relations. It bases its assessment of the state of international relations theorizing primarily on Laudans pragmatic synthesis of competing ways of measuring scientific progress. In so doing, it not only clarifies the key variables of, their causal connections within, and thus the strengths and weaknesses of each of the major theoretical works, but also unravels the central underlying, ifnot entirely value-free, assumptions of those purported theories.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 국제학연구소-
dc.titleThe Problem of Scientific Progress and Major Schools of Thought in Contemporary International Politics Theory-
dc.typeSNU Journal-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박훈주-
dc.citation.journaltitleJournal of International and Area Studies-
dc.citation.endpage20-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.pages1-20-
dc.citation.startpage1-
dc.citation.volume5-
Appears in Collections:
Graduate School of International Studies (국제대학원)Dept. of International Studies (국제학과)Journal of International and Area Studies (JIAS)Journal of International and Area Studies vol.05 (1998)
Files in This Item:
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse