Publications

Detailed Information

Self-reported experience and outcomes of care among stomach cancer patients at a median follow-up time of 27 months from diagnosis

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sung-
dc.contributor.authorBae, Jae-Moon-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Young-Woo-
dc.contributor.authorRyu, Keun Won-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jun Ho-
dc.contributor.authorNoh, Jae-Hyung-
dc.contributor.authorSohn, Tae-Sung-
dc.contributor.authorHong, Seong-Kweon-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Myung Kyung-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Sang Min-
dc.contributor.authorYun, Young Ho-
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-28T07:59:14Z-
dc.date.available2010-01-28T07:59:14Z-
dc.date.issued2007-10-03-
dc.identifier.citationSupport Care Cancer. 2008 Jul;16(7):831-9. Epub 2007 Oct 2.en
dc.identifier.issn0941-4355 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17909862-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.springerlink.com/content/w48727230r5n15g0/fulltext.pdf-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/46292-
dc.description.abstractGOALS OF WORK: We aimed to identify clinical experiences associated with outcomes of care among stomach cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred thirty-two patients who had a diagnosis of stage I-III stomach cancer from 2001 through 2002 from two hospitals in South Korea responded to a survey questionnaire including sociodemographic and clinical data, information about care experiences, satisfaction with care, and quality of life (QOL). MAIN RESULTS: Involvement in decision making [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.81; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.13 to 2.89] and reflection of patients' opinions in treatment decisions (aOR = 2.54; 95% CI, 1.65 to 3.93) were associated with decision satisfaction. The factors associated with willingness to choose the same treatment over again were involvement in decision making (aOR = 2.37; 95% CI, 1.53 to 3.68) and no treatment toxicity (aOR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.87). Involvement in decision making, reflection of patients' opinions in treatment decisions, and treatment toxicity were associated with some functioning subscales of QOL (p < 0.05). Regular follow-up, however, was associated with poor social functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Quality improvement efforts for stomach cancer patients should focus not only on the quality of primary tumor therapy but also on how patients experience their care, such as patient-centered decision making, experience of treatment toxicity, and regular follow-up.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagen
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectAgeden
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studiesen
dc.subjectDecision Makingen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studiesen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden
dc.subjectPatient Participationen
dc.subjectPatient Satisfactionen
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen
dc.subjectPsychometricsen
dc.subjectQuality of Health Careen
dc.subjectQuestionnairesen
dc.subjectStomach Neoplasms/diagnosis/physiopathology/*psychology/surgeryen
dc.subjectTime Factorsen
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen
dc.subjectQuality of Life-
dc.titleSelf-reported experience and outcomes of care among stomach cancer patients at a median follow-up time of 27 months from diagnosisen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor배재문-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김영우-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor류근원-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이준호-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor노재형-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor손태성-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor홍성권-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이명경-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박상민-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor윤영호-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김승-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00520-007-0340-x-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share