Publications
Detailed Information
구순구개열 환자의 상악골 열성장에서 골신장술을 위한 Internal distraction device와 Rigid external distraction의 비교 : INTERNAL VS. RIGID EXTERNAL DISTRACTION DEVICE FOR THE MAXILLARY HYPOPLASIA OF CLEFT PATIENTS
Cited 0 time in
Web of Science
Cited 0 time in Scopus
- Authors
- Issue Date
- 2005
- Publisher
- 대한악안면성형재건외과학회
- Citation
- 대한악안면성형재건외과학회지 27(4) : 324-333, 2005
- Keywords
- Distraction Osteogenesis ; Cleft Lip and Palate ; Maxillary Hypoplasia ; Rigid external distraction
- Abstract
- Distraction osteogenesis for the advancement of hypoplastic maxilla of cleft patients has shown successful results. In this report, rigid external distraction(RED) system and internal distraction device were used for maxillary advancement. Each system has its advantages and disadvantages. Larger amount of advancement can be achieved with RED system. But complex external device may give patients psychological stress. Internal device is invisible. However its distraction amount have limitation for the advancement (< 20mm) and the vector cannot be changed freely during distraction. The authors treated five cleft patients with maxillary hypoplasia(three with RED system and two with internal distractor). Their results were clinically satisfactory. We present the pros and cons of RED and internal system for maxillary distraction osteogenesis.
- ISSN
- 1225-4207
- Language
- Korean
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.