Publications

Detailed Information

Is gastrectomy mandatory for all residual or recurrent gastric cancer following endoscopic resection? A large-scale Korean multi-center study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorSong, Kyo Young-
dc.contributor.authorHyung, Woo Jin-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyung Ho-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Sang Uk-
dc.contributor.authorCho, Gyu Seok-
dc.contributor.authorRyu, Seung Wan-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hyuk Joon-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Min Chan-
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-09T06:51:21Z-
dc.date.available2010-04-09T06:51:21Z-
dc.date.issued2008-06-04-
dc.identifier.citationJ Surg Oncol. 2008 ;98(1):6-10.en
dc.identifier.issn1096-9098 (Electronic)-
dc.identifier.issn0022-4790 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/62876-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To clarify optimal treatment guidelines for residual or local recurrence after endoscopic resection (ER). METHODS: Eighty-six patients underwent gastrectomy due to incomplete ER and local recurrence after ER. The pathological findings of ER and gastrectomy specimens were analyzed. RESULTS: The cause of gastrectomy was categorized into five groups; submucosal (sm) invasion without margin involvement, positive margin, margin not evaluable, high risk of lymph node metastasis and local recurrence after ER. According to the pathological findings of gastrectomy specimens, remnant cancer and lymph node metastases were found in 56 (65.1%) and in 5 patients (5.8%), respectively. At 10 gastrectomy specimens which were sm invasion without margin involvement, the scattered residual cancer cells were found around the ulcer scar in 2 (20%) patients. In 11 of 44 margin involvement specimens, no residual cancer or lymph node metastasis was found. In patients with local recurrence, mean duration from ER to surgery was 14.8 months, and 19% of patients were found to have sm or deeper depth of invasion. CONCLUSION: Gastrectomy with lymph node dissection should be performed in patients with sm invasion with or without margin involvement. However, minimal approach other than gastrectomy could further be applied to selected patients.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectAgeden
dc.subjectAged, 80 and overen
dc.subjectCarcinoma/*pathology/secondary/*surgeryen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studiesen
dc.subjectGastroscopyen
dc.subjectGuideline Adherence/standardsen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectLaparoscopyen
dc.subjectLymph Node Excisionen
dc.subjectLymphatic Metastasisen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden
dc.subjectNeoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology/*surgeryen
dc.subjectNeoplasm, Residual/pathology/*surgeryen
dc.subjectPractice Guidelines as Topicen
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen
dc.subjectReoperationen
dc.subjectStomach Neoplasms/*pathology/*surgeryen
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen
dc.subjectGastrectomy-
dc.titleIs gastrectomy mandatory for all residual or recurrent gastric cancer following endoscopic resection? A large-scale Korean multi-center studyen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor송교영-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor송교영-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor형우진-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor형우진-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김형호-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김형호-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor한상욱-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor한상욱-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor조규석-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor조규석-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor류승완-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor류승완-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이혁준-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이혁준-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김민찬-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김민찬-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jso.21074-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share