Publications

Detailed Information

Treatment of patients with clinically lymph node-negative squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorJang, Won Il-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Hong-Gyun-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Charn Il-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Kwang Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorSung, Myoung-Whun-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Myung-Jin-
dc.contributor.authorChoung, Pill-Hoon-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jong-Ho-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Jin-Yong-
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-03T06:11:47Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-03T06:11:47Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationJpn J Clin Oncol 2008;38:395-401en
dc.identifier.issn0368-2811-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/69666-
dc.description.abstractMethods: Two hundred and twenty-seven patients with oral cavity SCC received radiotherapy with curative intent. We retrospectively analyzed 69 patients with clinically N0 disease. Forty-three patients were treated with surgery followed by radiotherapy (S+EBRT) and 26 with radiotherapy alone (EBRT). The median doses administered were 63.0 Gy for S+EBRT and 70.2 Gy for EBRT.

Results: The rates of occult metastasis were 60% for T1, 69% for T2, 100% for T3 and 39% for T4, respectively, among patients who underwent neck dissection. A contralateral occult metastasis occurred only in two patients. The median follow-up was 39 months (range, 6–170 months). The 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local control (LC) and regional control (RC) rates for all patients were 56, 50, 66 and 79%, respectively. The 5-year OS, DFS, LC and RC rates were 67/39% (P < 0.01), 66/24% (P < 0.01), 87/30% (P < 0.01) and 73/89% (P = 0.11) for S+EBRT/EBRT, respectively.

Conclusions: The risk for occult neck metastasis is high in patients with oral cavity SCC; therefore, elective neck treatment should be considered. Excellent RC for subclinical disease can be achieved with radiotherapy alone. However, external beam radiotherapy alone to primary tumor resulted in poor LC and combined treatment with surgery and radiotherapy appeared to be a better treatment strategy.
en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.subjectoral cavity canceren
dc.subjectsquamous cell carcinomaen
dc.subjectlymph node-negativeen
dc.subjectradiotherapyen
dc.subjectsurgeryen
dc.titleTreatment of patients with clinically lymph node-negative squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavityen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor장원일-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor우홍균-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박찬일-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김광현-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor성명완-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김명진-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor정필훈-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이종호-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최진용-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jjco/hyn048-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share