Publications

Detailed Information

재구성영상 형성방법에 따른 디지털영상공제술의 정확성 비교연구 : A comparative study on the accuracy of digital subtraction radiography according to the aquisition methods of reconstructed images

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author허영준-
dc.contributor.author전인성-
dc.contributor.author허민석-
dc.contributor.author이삼선-
dc.contributor.author최순철-
dc.contributor.author박태원-
dc.contributor.author김종대-
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-12T07:13:21Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-12T07:13:21Z-
dc.date.issued2002-06-
dc.identifier.citationKorean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2002;32:107-111en
dc.identifier.issn1229-8212-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/74054-
dc.description.abstractPurpose : To compare the accuracy of digital subtraction images acquired by two different methods different in positioning four reference points for geometrical standardization. Materials and Methods : A total of 36 digital radiographic images of 6 volunteers were taken at the areas of the incisor, premolar, and molar of both the maxilla and mandible using the Digora system. Each image was moved 4 mm vertically and horizontally. Four oral and maxillofacial radiologists performed digital subtraction radiography between the paired images before and after movement using Emago (Oral Diagnostic Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) and Sunny (Biomedisys Co., Seoul, Korea). The standard deviation of the internal gray value in Region of Interest (ROI) was statistically analyzed between the two programs using the paired t-test. Results : The standard deviation of pixel gray values from the digital subtraction images using the Sunny program were lower than that of the Emago program (p<0.05). All observers showed significant differences between each other when the Sunny program was used (p<0.05), but one observer showed a significantly higher score than other observers when they used Emago (p<0.05). The standard deviations of premolar area from both Sunny and Emago programs were significantly higher than those of anterior and molar regions (p<0.05). Conclusion: The subtracted images using the Sunny program were more accurate and sensitive than those taken using the Emago program.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by a grant of the Korea Health 21 R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea.(01-PJ5-PG1-01CH12-0002)en
dc.language.isokoen
dc.publisher대한구강악안면방사선학회en
dc.subjectsubtraction techniqueen
dc.subjectradiographyen
dc.subjectdentalen
dc.subjectdigitalen
dc.subjectradiographic image interpretationen
dc.subjectcomputer assisteden
dc.title재구성영상 형성방법에 따른 디지털영상공제술의 정확성 비교연구en
dc.title.alternativeA comparative study on the accuracy of digital subtraction radiography according to the aquisition methods of reconstructed imagesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorHuh, Young-June-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorJeon, In-Seong-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorHeo, Min-Suk-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorLee, Sam-Sun-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorChoi, Soon-Chul-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorPark, Tae-Won-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorKim, Jong-Dae-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share