Publications

Detailed Information

Decelerating agricultural society: Theoretical and historical perspectives

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Tai-Yoo-
dc.contributor.authorHeshmati, Almas-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Jihyoun-
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-02T06:04:28Z-
dc.date.available2011-12-02T06:04:28Z-
dc.date.issued2010-03-01-
dc.identifier.citationTECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE; Vol.77 3; 479-499-
dc.identifier.issn0040-1625-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/75005-
dc.description.abstractIn general, societies are divided into agricultural and industrial types. This study presents theoretical and historical perspectives on decelerating agricultural societies. Agricultural demand and supply play major roles in society development. Three descriptions of an agricultural society and theories of its deceleration patterns are presented: the neo-classical production function, stage theory, and induced innovation. Two important cases of decelerating agricultural societies and their ultimate replacement by industrial societies, medieval Europe and nineteenth- and twentieth-century United States, are examined. The limitations of decelerating agricultural societies with a focus on structural problems, impacts of industrial structure, and problems of agriculture in market and non-market areas, are also discussed. The position of agriculture as described by economic development theory is established by analyzing the stages of economic development, the theory of structural change, and the theory of leading industry. Finally, the transition from an agricultural to a commercial society is described with a focus on the formation, development, value creation, and structural limitations of a commercial society. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC-
dc.subjectAgricultural development-
dc.subjectCommercial society-
dc.subjectDecelerating society-
dc.subjectAgricultural society-
dc.subjectEconomic growth-
dc.subjectSimple reproduction-
dc.subjectInduced innovation-
dc.titleDecelerating agricultural society: Theoretical and historical perspectives-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김태유-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박지현-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.techfore.2009.08.005-
dc.citation.journaltitleTECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE-
dc.description.citedreferenceWALLERSTEIN I, 1976, MODERN WORLD SYSTEM-
dc.description.citedreferenceKELLEY AC, 1972, DUALISTIC EC DEV THE-
dc.description.citedreferenceHAYAMI Y, 1971, AGR DEV INT PERSPECT-
dc.description.citedreferenceVANBATH BHS, 1967, ACTA HIST NEERLANDIC, V2, P26-
dc.description.citedreferenceVONTHUNEN JH, 1966, ISOLATED STATE-
dc.description.citedreferenceYAMAGUCHI M, 1965, AM J AGR ECON, V32, P269-
dc.description.citedreferenceSCHULTZ TW, 1964, TRANSFORMING TRADITI-
dc.description.citedreferenceVANBATH BHS, 1963, AGRARIAN HIST W EURO-
dc.description.citedreferenceJOHNSTON BF, 1961, AM ECON REV, V51, P563-
dc.description.citedreferencePLUCKNETT DL, 1994, AGR TECHNOLOGY POLIC-
dc.description.citedreferenceKIM S, 1995, HIST INT TRADE-
dc.description.citedreferenceBOWLER I, 1996, AGR CHANGE DEV COUNT-
dc.description.citedreferenceYOO BS, 1998, AGR EC-
dc.description.citedreferenceGow HR, 1998, EUR REV AGRIC ECON, V25, P331-
dc.description.citedreferenceBARNES DM, 1998, CAPPER VOLSTEAD ACT-
dc.description.citedreferenceMUNDLAK Y, 2000, AGR EC GROWTH THEORY-
dc.description.citedreferenceALLEN RC, 2000, EUROPEAN REV EC HIST, V3, P1-
dc.description.citedreferenceGARDNER BL, 2002, AM AGR 20 CENTURY IT-
dc.description.citedreferenceDARBY HC, 1976, NEW HIST GEOGRAPHY E-
dc.description.citedreferenceSTAVENHAGEN R, 1982, PROBLEMAS ETNICOS CA-
dc.description.citedreferencePHILLIPS CR, 1982, J ECON HIST, V42, P775-
dc.description.citedreferenceDEBERTIN D, 1986, AGR PRODUCTION EC-
dc.description.citedreferenceABULUGHOD JL, 1989, EUROPEAN HEGEMONY WO-
dc.description.citedreferenceTOFFLER A, 1990, 3 WAVE-
dc.description.citedreferenceMATSUYAMA K, 1991, Q J ECON, V106, P617-
dc.description.citedreferenceHOFFMAN E, 1991, J ECON HIST, V51, P397-
dc.description.citedreferenceCLARK G, 1991, ECON HIST REV, V44, P445-
dc.description.citedreferenceGARDNER RA, 1993, EC GROWTH CHANGE BOU-
dc.description.citedreferenceCIPOLLA CM, 1993, IND REVOLUTION EUROP-
dc.description.citedreferenceOLMSTEAD AL, 1993, J POLIT ECON, V101, P100-
dc.description.citedreferenceGollin D, 2002, AM ECON REV, V92, P160-
dc.description.citedreferenceThirtle CG, 2002, AM J AGR ECON, V84, P598, DOI 10.1111/1467-8276.00322-
dc.description.citedreferenceJust RE, 2003, AM J AGR ECON, V85, P1249, DOI 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2003.00538.x-
dc.description.citedreferenceGABREMADHIN E, 2003, 62 INT FOOD POL RES-
dc.description.citedreferenceDaugbjerg C, 2003, J EUR PUBLIC POLICY, V10, P421, DOI 10.1080/1350176032000085388-
dc.description.citedreferenceLemoine F, 2004, WORLD DEV, V32, P829-
dc.description.citedreferenceFederico G, 2004, ECON HIST REV, V57, P437-
dc.description.citedreferencePAMUK S, 2007, ESTIMATING GDP CAPIT-
dc.description.citedreferenceROSTOW WW, 1960, STAGES EC GROWTH NON-
dc.description.citedreferenceGRILICHES Z, 1957, ECONOMETRICA, V25, P501-
dc.description.citedreferenceSOLOW RM, 1957, REV ECON STAT, V39, P320-
dc.description.citedreferenceRuttan VW, 1955, J FARM ECON, V37, P38-
dc.description.citedreferenceSCHULTZ TW, 1953, EC ORG AGR-
dc.description.citedreferenceJohnson DG, 1950, AM ECON REV, V40, P539-
dc.description.citedreferenceEzekiel M, 1938, Q J ECON, V52, P255-
dc.description.citedreferenceLEIGHTY CE, 1938, CROP ROTATION SOILS-
dc.description.citedreferenceENGEL E, 1895, INT STATISTICAL I B, V9, P1-
dc.description.tc0-
dc.identifier.wosid000276004900010-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share