Publications

Detailed Information

Productivity management methodology using productivity achievement ratio

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Tae Wan-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hyun-soo-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Moonseo-
dc.contributor.authorYu, Jung-Ho-
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-08T01:39:04Z-
dc.date.available2011-12-08T01:39:04Z-
dc.date.issued2011-01-
dc.identifier.citationKSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING; Vol.15 1; 23-31-
dc.identifier.issn1226-7988-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/75086-
dc.description.abstractAlthough construction productivity has received a great deal of attention from construction practitioners and researchers, few research efforts have specifically evaluated productivity in the context of the productivity management cycle. Consequently, there is still a lack of useful indicators for determining which items should be prioritized and improved upon in order to yield the highest benefits from productivity management. In an effort to address this issue, this study proposes the Productivity Achievement Ratio (PAR), which is a productivity evaluation indicator that will assist in the selection of the most appropriate management items for construction productivity enhancement. Using a multiple linear regression analysis, the process for calculating the PAR is developed, and the applicability of the proposed indicator is verified through a case study of steel erection work. The results of this study indicate that the PAR can aid construction practitioners in achieving more balanced and effective productivity management, even when management resources are limited.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSPRINGER-
dc.subjectproductivity-
dc.subjectreduction factor-
dc.subjectproductivity management-
dc.subjectproductivity achievement ratio-
dc.subjectregression analysis-
dc.titleProductivity management methodology using productivity achievement ratio-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김태완-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이현수-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박문서-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor유정호-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12205-011-0983-5-
dc.citation.journaltitleKSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING-
dc.description.citedreferenceKIM T, 2003, 4 ANN KOR I CONSTR E, P311-
dc.description.citedreferenceKIM T, 2003, 19 ANN ARCOM C U BRI, P467-
dc.description.citedreferenceSON C, 2002, J ARCHITECTURAL I KO, V18, P125-
dc.description.citedreferenceHONG S, 2001, RES METHODOLOGY SOCI-
dc.description.citedreferenceTHOMAS R, 1999, J ARCHITECTURAL ENG, V5, P1-
dc.description.citedreferenceTHOMAS R, 1999, J CONSTR ENG M ASCE, V125, P295-
dc.description.citedreferenceJEONG I, 1995, J ARCHITECTURAL I KO, V11, P153-
dc.description.citedreferenceBETTELEY G, 1994, USING STAT IND-
dc.description.citedreferenceKIM Y, 1994, J ARCHITECTURAL I KO, V10, P267-
dc.description.citedreferenceALARCON L, 1992, 80 U TEX AUST CONSTR-
dc.description.citedreferenceHERBSMAN Z, 1990, CONSTRUCTION MANAGEM, V8, P49-
dc.description.citedreferenceTHOMAS R, 1990, J CONSTR ENG M ASCE, V116, P705-
dc.description.citedreferenceOGLESBY CH, 1989, PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVE-
dc.description.citedreferenceADRIAN JJ, 1987, CONSTRUCTION PRODUCT-
dc.description.citedreferenceHEAP A, 1987, IMPROVING SITE PRODU-
dc.description.citedreferenceHEAP A, 1987, IMPROVING SITE PRODU, 1987, MEASURING PRODUCTIVI-
dc.description.citedreferenceBORCHERDING J, 1986, WORK FORCE MANAGEMEN-
dc.description.citedreferenceSUMANTH DJ, 1984, PRODUCTIVITY ENG MAN-
dc.description.citedreferenceKIM W, 1980, MODERN STAT-
dc.description.tc0-
dc.identifier.wosid000285209300003-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share