Publications

Detailed Information

On the creation and evaluation of e-business model variants: The case of auction

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorShin, Juneseuk-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Yongtae-
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-05T02:29:46Z-
dc.date.available2012-03-05T02:29:46Z-
dc.date.issued2009-04-01-
dc.identifier.citationINDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT; Vol.38 3; 324-337-
dc.identifier.issn0019-8501-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/75324-
dc.description.abstractE-business model variants aim at creating customer value through differentiation. At the core are two major components of the business model concept-business process and customer value. Focusing narrowly on these components, this paper provides a new and systematic way to identify both, create potentially competitive variants, and to evaluate them quantitatively. With a clear presentation of the whole business process, it is possible to highlight key sub-processes, and increase a shared understanding between multiple stakeholders. Moreover, understanding customer preference and the expected market share of potential variants can allow managers to benefit from clear value propositions for variants'''''''' potential profitability. Our method also promotes rapid and efficient consensus-building about the most competitive variant. Taken together, our proposed method will help both managers and researchers refine the business model more precisely. An e-auction case in Korea is presented to illustrate the empirical application of our method in detail. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC-
dc.subjectE-business model variant-
dc.subjectE-auction-
dc.subjectCreation-
dc.subjectEvaluation-
dc.titleOn the creation and evaluation of e-business model variants: The case of auction-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor신준석-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박용태-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.06.017-
dc.citation.journaltitleINDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT-
dc.description.citedreferenceMorris M, 2005, J BUS RES, V58, P726, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.11.001-
dc.description.citedreferenceAnderson BB, 2005, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V39, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2003.12.001-
dc.description.citedreferenceVANDERRAADT B, 2005, P 2005 13 IEEE INT C, P53-
dc.description.citedreferenceMoore WL, 2004, INT J RES MARK, V21, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2004.01.002-
dc.description.citedreferenceShen H, 2004, COMPUT IND, V54, P307, DOI 10.1016/j.compind.2003.07.009-
dc.description.citedreferenceJOYCE P, 2004, VALUE CREATION E BUS-
dc.description.citedreferenceKRIEGER AM, 2004, MONOGRAPH U PENNSYLV-
dc.description.citedreferenceULRICH KT, 2003, PRODUCT DESIGN DEV-
dc.description.citedreferenceGORDIJN J, 2003, REQUIREMENTS ENG J, V8, P114, DOI 10.1007/s00766-003-0169-x-
dc.description.citedreferenceHAYNE SC, 2003, ELECT MARKETS, V13, P282, DOI 10.1080/1019678032000135536-
dc.description.citedreferenceChesbrough H, 2002, IND CORP CHANGE, V11, P529-
dc.description.citedreferenceMagretta J, 2002, HARVARD BUS REV, V80, P86-
dc.description.citedreferenceHuckvale M, 2002, COMPUT SPEECH LANG, V16, P165, DOI 10.1006/csla.2001.0187-
dc.description.citedreferenceKIOLOV H, 2002, BUSINESS MODELS GUID-
dc.description.citedreferenceAmit R, 2001, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V22, P493-
dc.description.citedreferenceGREEN PE, 2001, INTERFACES, V31, P56-
dc.description.citedreferencePORTER ME, 2001, HARVARD BUS REV, V79, P63-
dc.description.citedreferenceRAYPORT JF, 2001, E COMMERCE-
dc.description.citedreferenceWEILL P, 2001, PLACE SPACE-
dc.description.citedreferenceALT R, 2001, ELECTRON MARK, V11, P3-
dc.description.citedreferenceHAN D, 2001, VALUE BASED STRATEGY-
dc.description.citedreferenceAPPLEGATE L, 2001, HARVARD BUSINESS SCH, P61-
dc.description.citedreferenceHaaijer R, 2000, J MARKETING RES, V37, P376-
dc.description.citedreferenceAFUAH A, 2000, INTERNET BUSINESS MO-
dc.description.citedreferenceFOWLER M, 2000, UML DISTILLED BRIEF-
dc.description.citedreferenceMCFADDEN D, 2000, DISAGGREGATE BEHAV T-
dc.description.citedreferenceERIKSSON H, 1999, BUSINESS MODELING UM-
dc.description.citedreferenceORME B, 1999, ACA CBC BOTH EFFECTI-
dc.description.citedreferenceVenkatraman N, 1998, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V40, P33-
dc.description.citedreferenceBen-Akiva M, 1998, J FORECASTING, V17, P175-
dc.description.citedreferenceTIMMERS P, 1998, ELECT MARKETS, V8, P3-
dc.description.citedreferenceVERNADAT FB, 1996, ENTERPRISE MODELING-
dc.description.citedreferenceSLYWOTZKY A, 1996, VALUE MIGRATION-
dc.description.citedreferenceRHYNE R, 1995, FUTURES, V27, P657-
dc.description.citedreferenceOLUD MA, 1995, BUSINESS PROCESSES M-
dc.description.citedreferenceWITTINK DR, 1994, INT J RES MARK, V11, P41-
dc.description.citedreferenceKUKALIS S, 1994, INT J MANAGEMENT, V11, P676-
dc.description.citedreferenceKOHJI R, 1991, J MARKETING RES, V28, P347-
dc.description.citedreferenceGREEN PE, 1988, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V16, P114-
dc.description.citedreferenceMARCA DA, 1988, STRUCTURED ANAL DESI-
dc.description.citedreferenceLOUVIERE JJ, 1983, J MARKETING RES, V20, P350-
dc.description.citedreferenceBATSELL RR, 1981, J MARKETING RES, V18, P1-
dc.description.citedreferenceRAO VR, 1978, 388 U ILL SCH BUS AD-
dc.description.citedreferenceANDERSON NH, 1970, PSYCHOL REV, V77, P153-
dc.description.citedreferenceZWICKY F, 1969, DISCOVERY INVENTION-
dc.description.citedreferenceKRUSKAL JB, 1965, J ROY STAT SOC B, V27, P251-
dc.description.citedreferenceLUCE RD, 1964, J MATH PSYCHOL, V1, P1-
dc.description.citedreferenceSCHUMPETER JA, 1934, THEORY EC DEV INQUIR-
dc.description.tc0-
dc.identifier.wosid000264973600009-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share