Publications

Detailed Information

Selection of technology acquisition mode using the analytic network process

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hakyeon-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Sora-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Yongtae-
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-05T02:29:53Z-
dc.date.available2012-03-05T02:29:53Z-
dc.date.issued2009-03-01-
dc.identifier.citationMATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING; Vol.49 5-6; 1274-1282-
dc.identifier.issn0895-7177-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/75326-
dc.description.abstractSelecting the appropriate acquisition mode for a required technology, is one of the critical strategic decisions in formulating a technology strategy. Although a number of factors were found to be influential in the choice of technology acquisition mode, it still remains a void in the literature how to make a strategic decision, based on a huge set of those factors with the help of a systematic approach. This study deals with the selection of technology acquisition mode as a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problem. The proposed solution to the problem in this study, is the analytic network process (ANP) approach. Since the ANP is a MCDM method that can accommodate interdependency among decision attributes, it is capable of providing priorities of alternatives with consideration of interrelationships among strategic factors. The 21 influential factors identified from the empirical studies are included as sub-criteria in the ANP model, and they are grouped into five criteria: capability, strategy, technology, market, and environment. The final decision can be made based on the resulting priorities of the alternative acquisition modes. The proposed approach is expected to effectively aid decision making on which mode is adopted for acquisition of required technologies. A case of a software company is presented for the illustration of the proposed approach. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD-
dc.subjectTechnology strategy-
dc.subjectTechnology acquisition mode-
dc.subjectAnalytic network process-
dc.titleSelection of technology acquisition mode using the analytic network process-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이학연-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이소라-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박용태-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.mcm.2008.08.010-
dc.citation.journaltitleMATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee H, 2010, J ENG DESIGN, V21, P75, DOI 10.1080/09544820802232517-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee H, 2009, EXPERT SYST APPL, V36, P894, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.026-
dc.description.citedreferenceUstun O, 2008, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V36, P509, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2006.12.004-
dc.description.citedreferencePromentilla MAB, 2008, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V88, P479, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.013-
dc.description.citedreferenceDagdeviren M, 2008, SAFETY SCI, V46, P771, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.02.002-
dc.description.citedreferenceRaisinghani MS, 2007, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, V54, P673, DOI 10.1109/TEM.2007.906857-
dc.description.citedreferenceGerdsri N, 2007, MATH COMPUT MODEL, V46, P1071, DOI 10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.015-
dc.description.citedreferenceSimunich B, 2007, MATH COMPUT MODEL, V46, P1130, DOI 10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.002-
dc.description.citedreferenceYuksel I, 2007, INFORM SCIENCES, V177, P3364, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2007.01.001-
dc.description.citedreferenceJharkharia S, 2007, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V35, P274, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2005.06.005-
dc.description.citedreferenceWu WW, 2007, EXPERT SYST APPL, V32, P841, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.01.029-
dc.description.citedreferenceHUNG SW, 2007, TECHNOVATION-
dc.description.citedreferenceSaen RF, 2006, APPL MATH COMPUT, V181, P1609, DOI 10.1016/j.amc.2006.03.013-
dc.description.citedreferenceShyur HJ, 2006, MATH COMPUT MODEL, V44, P749, DOI 10.1016/j.mcm.2005.04.018-
dc.description.citedreferenceLeung L, 2006, J OPER RES SOC, V57, P682, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602040-
dc.description.citedreferenceKahraman C, 2006, EUR J OPER RES, V171, P390, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.09.016-
dc.description.citedreferencePOON J, 2005, J ENG TECHNOL MANAGE, V42, P321-
dc.description.citedreferenceHemmert M, 2004, RES POLICY, V33, P1019, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2004.04.003-
dc.description.citedreferenceALLRED BB, 2004, J INT MANAG, V10, P259-
dc.description.citedreferenceBaines T, 2004, INT J OPER PROD MAN, V24, P447, DOI 10.1108/01443570410532533-
dc.description.citedreferenceDavenport S, 2003, R&D MANAGE, V33, P481, DOI 10.1111/1467-9310.00312-
dc.description.citedreferenceAgarwal A, 2003, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V8, P324, DOI 10.1108/13598540310490080-
dc.description.citedreferenceMeade LA, 2002, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, V49, P59, DOI 10.1109/17.985748-
dc.description.citedreferenceCHIESA V, 2001, R D STRATEGY ORG MAN-
dc.description.citedreferenceCho DH, 2000, TECHNOVATION, V20, P691-
dc.description.citedreferenceSteensma HK, 2000, ACAD MANAGE J, V43, P1045-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee JW, 2000, COMPUT OPER RES, V27, P367-
dc.description.citedreferenceMeade LM, 1999, INT J PROD RES, V37, P241-
dc.description.citedreferenceVeugelers R, 1999, RES POLICY, V28, P63-
dc.description.citedreferenceCANEZ L, 1999, P PORTL INT C MAN EN, P47, DOI 10.1109/PICMET.1999.787787-
dc.description.citedreferenceLowe J, 1998, R&D MANAGE, V28, P263-
dc.description.citedreferenceCroisier B, 1998, R&D MANAGE, V28, P289-
dc.description.citedreferenceChiesa V, 1998, R&D MANAGE, V28, P199-
dc.description.citedreferenceVeugelers R, 1997, RES POLICY, V26, P303-
dc.description.citedreferenceKurokawa S, 1997, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, V44, P124, DOI 10.1109/17.584921-
dc.description.citedreferenceMadhok A, 1997, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V18, P39-
dc.description.citedreferenceKumar V, 1996, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, V43, P273, DOI 10.1109/17.511838-
dc.description.citedreferenceSAATY TL, 1996, DECISION MAKING DEPE-
dc.description.citedreferenceTYLER BB, 1995, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V16, P43-
dc.description.citedreferenceLLERENA P, 1994, GLOBAL TELECOMMUNICA, P257-
dc.description.citedreferenceMAHONEY JT, 1992, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V13, P559-
dc.description.citedreferenceAUSTER ER, 1992, MANAGE SCI, V38, P778-
dc.description.citedreferenceCAINARCA GC, 1992, RES POLICY, V21, P45-
dc.description.citedreferenceDODGSON M, 1992, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V4, P227-
dc.description.citedreferenceMOENAERT RK, 1990, R&D MANAGE, V20, P291-
dc.description.citedreferencePISANO GP, 1990, ADMIN SCI QUART, V35, P153-
dc.description.citedreferenceSHAN WJ, 1990, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V11, P129-
dc.description.citedreferenceBAUGHN CC, 1990, J HIGH TECHNOLOGY MA, V1, P181-
dc.description.citedreferencePERRINO AC, 1989, RES TECHNOL MANAGE, V32, P12-
dc.description.citedreferenceHAMEL G, 1989, HARVARD BUS REV, V67, P133-
dc.description.citedreferenceFORD D, 1988, LONG RANGE PLANN, V21, P85-
dc.description.citedreferenceKOGUT B, 1988, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V9, P319-
dc.description.citedreferenceWALKER G, 1987, ACAD MANAGE J, V30, P589-
dc.description.citedreferenceROSENBLOOM RS, 1987, CALIF MANAGE REV, V29, P51-
dc.description.citedreferenceTEECE DJ, 1986, RES POLICY, V15, P285-
dc.description.citedreferenceROBERTS EB, 1985, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V26, P3-
dc.description.citedreferenceSPENCE AM, 1984, ECONOMETRICA, V52, P101-
dc.description.citedreferenceNELSON R, 1982, EVOLUTIONARY THEORY-
dc.description.citedreferenceSAATY TL, 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE-
dc.description.tc1-
dc.identifier.wosid000263151100040-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share