Publications

Detailed Information

Incorporating Affective Customer Needs for Luxuriousness into Product Design Attributes

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorBahn, Sangwoo-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Cheol-
dc.contributor.authorNam, Chang S.-
dc.contributor.authorYun, Myung Hwan-
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-05T02:30:12Z-
dc.date.available2012-03-05T02:30:12Z-
dc.date.issued2012-03-05-
dc.identifier.citationHUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS IN MANUFACTURING; Vol.19 2; 105-127-
dc.identifier.issn1090-8471-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/75331-
dc.description.abstractIn a highly competitive market, customers'''''''' product affection is I critical factor to product Success. However, understanding customers'''''''' affective needs is difficults to grasp. product design practitioners often misunderstand what customers really want. In this study we report our experience in developing and using an affective design framework that identified critical affective features customers have on products and are systematically incorporated into product design attributes. To identify key affective features Such as luxuriousness, we utilized the Kansei engineering methodology. This approach consists of three steps: (1) selecting related affective features and product design attributes through a comprehensive literature survey, expert panel opinion, and focus group interviews (2) conducting evaluation experiments and (3) developing Kansei models using multivariate statistical analysis and analyzing critical product design attributes. To demonstrate applicability of the proposed affective design framework, 30 customers and 30 product design practitioners participated in an evaluation experiment for car crash pads, and 44 customers and 20 designers participated in an evaluation experiment for two interior room products (wallpapers and flooring materials). The evaluation experiments were conducted via systematically developed questionnaires consisting of a 7-point semantic differential scale and a 100-point magnitude estimation scale. The results of the experiments were analyzed using principal component regression and quantification theory type I method. Using the analyled survey data, the relationship between luxuriousness and related affective features and product design attributes were identified. This relationship indicated that there was a significant difference in the perception of luxuriousness between customers and designers. Consequently, it is expected that the results of this study could provide a foundation for developing affective products. (C) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherJOHN WILEY & SONS INC-
dc.titleIncorporating Affective Customer Needs for Luxuriousness into Product Design Attributes-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor반상우-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이철-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor윤명환-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/hfm.20140-
dc.citation.journaltitleHUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS IN MANUFACTURING-
dc.description.citedreferenceLlinares C, 2007, BUILD ENVIRON, V42, P2488, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.06.012-
dc.description.citedreferenceKhalid HM, 2006, CONCURRENT ENG-RES A, V14, P197, DOI 10.1177/1063293X06068387-
dc.description.citedreferenceYou H, 2006, INT J IND ERGONOM, V36, P323, DOI 10.1016/j.ergon.2005.12.007-
dc.description.citedreferenceMondragon S, 2005, INT J IND ERGONOM, V35, P1021, DOI 10.1016/j.ergon.2005.05.001-
dc.description.citedreferenceSchutte S, 2005, APPL ERGON, V36, P557, DOI 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.02.002-
dc.description.citedreferenceAlcantara E, 2005, INT J IND ERGONOM, V35, P713, DOI 10.1016/j.ergon.2005.02.005-
dc.description.citedreferenceHELANDER MG, 2005, HDB HUMAN FACTORS ER, P543-
dc.description.citedreferenceOu LC, 2004, COLOR RES APPL, V29, P232, DOI 10.1002/col.20010-
dc.description.citedreferencePetiot JF, 2004, INT J IND ERGONOM, V33, P507, DOI 10.1016/j.ergon.2003.12.004-
dc.description.citedreferenceJANG HJ, 2004, THESIS YONSEI U SEOU-
dc.description.citedreferenceHelander MG, 2003, ERGONOMICS, V46, P1269, DOI 10.1080/00140130310001610810-
dc.description.citedreferenceYun MH, 2003, ERGONOMICS, V46, P1423, DOI 10.1080/00140130310001610919-
dc.description.citedreferenceDemirbilek O, 2003, ERGONOMICS, V46, P1346, DOI 10.1080/00140130310001610874-
dc.description.citedreferenceLiu RX, 2003, COMPUT METH PROG BIO, V71, P141, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2607(02)00058-5-
dc.description.citedreferenceTSENG M, 2003, CUSTOMER CENTRIC ENT-
dc.description.citedreferenceHOUSER KW, 2003, LIGHTING RES TECHNOL, V35, P183-
dc.description.citedreferenceNAGAMACHI M, 2002, ERGONOMICS DESIGN, V10, P5-
dc.description.citedreferenceChuang MC, 2001, INT J IND ERGONOM, V27, P233-
dc.description.citedreferenceMONTGOMERY DC, 2001, ENG STAT-
dc.description.citedreferenceYUN MH, 2001, P HUM FACT ERG SOC 4, P712-
dc.description.citedreferenceHsu SH, 2000, INT J IND ERGONOM, V25, P375-
dc.description.citedreferenceCROSS N, 2000, ENG DESIGN METHODS S-
dc.description.citedreferenceJORDAN PW, 2000, P C PLEAS BAS HUM FA-
dc.description.citedreferenceSlater SF, 1998, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V19, P1001-
dc.description.citedreferenceHuffman C, 1998, J RETAILING, V74, P491-
dc.description.citedreferencePORTER ME, 1998, COMPETITIVE ADVANTAG-
dc.description.citedreferenceHEO MH, 1998, QUANTIFICATION METHO-
dc.description.citedreferenceNAGAMACHI M, 1998, INTRO KANSEI ENG-
dc.description.citedreferenceTanoue C, 1997, INT J IND ERGONOM, V19, P115-
dc.description.citedreferenceJindo T, 1997, INT J IND ERGONOM, V19, P105-
dc.description.citedreferenceNakada K, 1997, INT J IND ERGONOM, V19, P129-
dc.description.citedreference*POST, 1997, DEV US EV METH UNPUB-
dc.description.citedreferenceKRIPPENDORFF K, 1995, IDEA DESIGN, P156-
dc.description.citedreferenceCLAUSING DP, 1994, TOTAL QUALITY DEV ST-
dc.description.citedreferenceLACHANCEPORTER S, 1993, P 14 NAT ON LIN M NE, P265-
dc.description.citedreferenceHAUGE PL, 1993, ASME PUBLICATION, V53, P73-
dc.description.citedreferenceGRIFFIN A, 1992, MARKET SCI, V12, P1-
dc.description.citedreferenceDRUCKER PF, 1985, INNOVATION ENTREPREN-
dc.description.citedreferenceOSGOOD C, 1967, MEASUREMENT MEANING-
dc.description.tc3-
dc.identifier.wosid000263530900002-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share