Publications

Detailed Information

Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence in high-grade gliomas: Assessing the efficacy of (18)F-FDG PET, (11)C-methionine PET and perfusion MRI

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Yong Hwy-
dc.contributor.authorOh, So Won-
dc.contributor.authorLim, You Jung-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Chul-Kee-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Keon Wook-
dc.contributor.authorChang, Kee Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorJung, Hee-Won-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Se-Hoon-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-27T08:17:24Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-27T08:17:24Z-
dc.date.issued2010-11-
dc.identifier.citationCLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY; Vol.112 9; 758-765ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0303-8467-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/77647-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The authors analyzed the characteristics of perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and (11)C-methionine (MET) PET to compare the efficacies of these modalities in making the distinction between radiation necrosis and tumor recurrence of high-grade glioma. Patients and methods: Ten patients were evaluated with dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI, (11)C-MET PET and (18)F-FDG PET to visualize gadolinium-enhanced lesions during the post-radiation follow-up period. In the perfusion MRI, four regions of interest (ROIs) were identified and average values were calculated. A reference ROI of the same size was defined in the contralateral white matter to obtain the relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV). After coregistering the PET images with the MRI, we measured the maximum uptake values of the lesion and of the contralateral cerebral white matter as reference area to calculate the L(max)/R(max) ratio. Results: The rCBV was higher in the recurrence group than in the necrosis group (p = 0.010). There was no difference between groups in terms of the L(max)/R(max) ratio as derived from the 18F-FDG and (11)C-MET PET. Conclusion:A quantitative rCBV as calculated from a perfusion MRI scan might be superior to the L(max)/R(max) ratio as derived from (18)F-FDG and (11)C-MET PET in order to distinguish a recurrence of high-grade glioma from radiation necrosis. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BVko_KR
dc.subjectHigh-grade gliomako_KR
dc.subjectRecurrenceko_KR
dc.subjectRadiation necrosisko_KR
dc.subjectPETko_KR
dc.subjectPerfusion MRIko_KR
dc.titleDifferentiating radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence in high-grade gliomas: Assessing the efficacy of (18)F-FDG PET, (11)C-methionine PET and perfusion MRIko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김용휘-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor오소원-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor임유정-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박철기-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이세훈-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor강건욱-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor정희원-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor장기현-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clineuro.2010.06.005-
dc.citation.journaltitleCLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY-
dc.description.citedreferenceArvinda HR, 2009, J NEURO-ONCOL, V94, P87, DOI 10.1007/s11060-009-9807-6-
dc.description.citedreferencePeca C, 2009, CLIN NEUROL NEUROSUR, V111, P331, DOI 10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.11.003-
dc.description.citedreferenceHu LS, 2009, AM J NEURORADIOL, V30, P552, DOI 10.3174/ajnr.A1377-
dc.description.citedreferenceYoung GS, 2009, AM J NEURORADIOL, V30, P575, DOI 10.3174/ajnr.A1239-
dc.description.citedreferenceBarajas RF, 2009, AM J NEURORADIOL, V30, P367, DOI 10.3174/ajnr.A1362-
dc.description.citedreferenceTie J, 2008, J CLIN NEUROSCI, V15, P1327, DOI 10.1016/j.jocn.2007.12.008-
dc.description.citedreferenceHatakeyama T, 2008, EUR J NUCL MED MOL I, V35, P2009, DOI 10.1007/s00259-008-0847-5-
dc.description.citedreferenceKato T, 2008, AM J NEURORADIOL, V29, P1176, DOI 10.3174/ajnr.A1008-
dc.description.citedreferenceBrandsma D, 2008, LANCET ONCOL, V9, P453-
dc.description.citedreferenceTerakawa Y, 2008, J NUCL MED, V49, P694, DOI 10.2967/jnumed.107.048082-
dc.description.citedreferenceDi Costanzo A, 2008, RADIOL MED, V113, P134, DOI 10.1007/s11547-008-0232-2-
dc.description.citedreferenceChen W, 2007, J CLIN ONCOL, V25, P4714, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.5825-
dc.description.citedreferenceZeng QS, 2007, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V68, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.001-
dc.description.citedreferenceSundgren PC, 2006, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V24, P1131, DOI 10.1016/j.mri.2006.07.008-
dc.description.citedreferenceBorbely K, 2006, J NEUROL SCI, V246, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.jns.2006.02.015-
dc.description.citedreferenceRachinger W, 2005, NEUROSURGERY, V57, P505, DOI 10.1227/01.NEU.0000171642.49553.B0-
dc.description.citedreferenceStupp R, 2005, NEW ENGL J MED, V352, P987-
dc.description.citedreferenceVan Laere K, 2005, EUR J NUCL MED MOL I, V32, P39, DOI 10.1007/s00259-004-1564-3-
dc.description.citedreferenceHustinx R, 2005, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V43, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.rcl.2004.09.009-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim S, 2005, EUR J NUCL MED MOL I, V32, P52, DOI 10.1007/s00259-004-1598-6-
dc.description.citedreferenceSpaeth N, 2004, J NUCL MED, V45, P1931-
dc.description.citedreferenceDowney RJ, 2004, J CLIN ONCOL, V22, P3255, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2004.11.109-
dc.description.citedreferenceGiammarile F, 2004, J NEURO-ONCOL, V68, P263-
dc.description.citedreferenceTsuyuguchi N, 2004, ANN NUCL MED, V18, P291-
dc.description.citedreferenceHein PA, 2004, AM J NEURORADIOL, V25, P201-
dc.description.citedreferenceChan YL, 2003, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V27, P674-
dc.description.citedreferenceIchinose T, 2003, NEUROL MED-CHIR, V43, P461-
dc.description.citedreferenceWong TZ, 2002, NEUROIMAG CLIN N AM, V12, P615-
dc.description.citedreferenceSchlemmer HP, 2002, NEURORADIOLOGY, V44, P216, DOI 10.1007/s002340100703-
dc.description.citedreferenceChao ST, 2001, INT J CANCER, V96, P191-
dc.description.citedreferenceMeyer PT, 2001, EUR J NUCL MED, V28, P165-
dc.description.citedreferenceKumar AJ, 2000, RADIOLOGY, V217, P377-
dc.description.citedreferenceLangleben DD, 2000, J NUCL MED, V41, P1861-
dc.description.citedreferenceFuss M, 2000, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V48, P53-
dc.description.citedreferenceSugahara T, 2000, AM J NEURORADIOL, V21, P901-
dc.description.citedreferenceKnopp EA, 1999, RADIOLOGY, V211, P791-
dc.description.citedreferenceSugahara T, 1998, AM J ROENTGENOL, V171, P1479-
dc.description.citedreferenceRicci PE, 1998, AM J NEURORADIOL, V19, P407-
dc.description.citedreferenceHazle JD, 1997, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V7, P1084-
dc.description.citedreferenceROELCKE U, 1995, J NEUROL SCI, V132, P20-
dc.description.citedreferenceFORSYTH PA, 1995, J NEUROSURG, V82, P436-
dc.description.citedreferenceKAHN D, 1994, AM J ROENTGENOL, V163, P1459-
dc.description.citedreferenceARONEN HJ, 1994, RADIOLOGY, V191, P41-
dc.description.citedreferenceCHIANG CS, 1993, RADIOTHER ONCOL, V29, P60-
dc.description.citedreferenceMACDONALD DR, 1990, J CLIN ONCOL, V8, P1277-
dc.description.citedreferencePAULUS W, 1989, CANCER, V64, P442-
dc.description.citedreferencePATRONAS NJ, 1982, RADIOLOGY, V144, P885-
dc.description.citedreferenceWALKER MD, 1978, J NEUROSURG, V49, P333-
dc.description.tc4-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share