Publications

Detailed Information

Laparoscopic Treatment for Intrahepatic Duct Stones in the Era of Laparoscopy: Laparoscopic Intrahepatic Duct Exploration and Laparoscopic Hepatectomy

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Yoo-Seok-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Ho-Seong-
dc.contributor.authorShin, Sang-Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorCho, Jai Young-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hyeon Kook-
dc.contributor.authorMin, Seog Ki-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-29T01:05:50Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-29T01:05:50Z-
dc.date.issued2009-02-
dc.identifier.citationANNALS OF SURGERY; Vol.249(2); 286-291ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0003-4932-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/77856-
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study is to analyze our experiences with laparoscopic surgery for treating intrahepatic duct (IHD) stones and to evaluate its role for the management of IHD stone. Summary Background Data: Until now, laparoscopic surgery for IHD stone has been rarely reported. Methods: From October 1998 to June 2007, we performed 76 cases of laparoscopic surgery for treating IHD stones [30 laparoscopic IHD explorations (LIHDE) and 46 laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH)]. The choice between LIHDE and LH was based on the severity of the IHD stricture, the presence of parenchymal atrophy, and the impaction of stones, as determined by the preoperative radiologic images or intraoperative choledochoscopy. Retrospective analysis was done on the clinical outcomes of the 76 patients. Results: Conversion to open surgery was needed in 6 patients (7.9%). The mean operation time (LIHDE vs. LH) was 278.4 and 344.3 minutes. respectively. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 14.6 and 12.8 days, respectively. Postoperative complications occurred in 28 patients (36.8%), and all of them responded to the conservative management. There was I case of postoperative mortality in the LH group because of sepsis. The overall initial success rate of removing the stones by laparoscopic surgery in our intention-to-treat analysis was 78.9% (60 of 76). The reasons for treatment failure included remnant stones (n = 9), conversion to open surgery (n = 6) and postoperative mortality (n = 1). For the 69 patients who had laparoscopic surgery successfully preformed without mortality, the initial success rate of stone clearance was 87.0% (60 of 69) and the final clearance rate after additional choledochoscopic stone removal was 92.8% (64 of 69). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that laparoscopic surgery can be an effective option for managing IHD stones and it also suggests the potential role of laparoscopic surgery for treating IHD stories in the era of laparoscopy.ko_KR
dc.description.sponsorshipSupported by a grant of the Korea Healthcare Technology R and D Project,
Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (A060299).
ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINSko_KR
dc.titleLaparoscopic Treatment for Intrahepatic Duct Stones in the Era of Laparoscopy: Laparoscopic Intrahepatic Duct Exploration and Laparoscopic Hepatectomyko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor윤유석-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor한호성-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor신상현-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor조재영-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor민석기-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이현국-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818eea56-
dc.citation.journaltitleANNALS OF SURGERY-
dc.description.citedreferenceKoffron AJ, 2007, ANN SURG, V246, P385, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318146996c-
dc.description.citedreferenceCai XJ, 2007, SURG ENDOSC, V21, P1074, DOI 10.1007/s00464-007-9306-9-
dc.description.citedreferenceUchiyama K, 2007, J GASTROINTEST SURG, V11, P626, DOI 10.1007/s11605-006-0024-8-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee TY, 2007, WORLD J SURG, V31, P479, DOI 10.1007/s00268-006-0441-6-
dc.description.citedreferenceSimillis C, 2007, SURGERY, V141, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2006.06.035-
dc.description.citedreferenceYoon YS, 2006, J LAPAROENDOSC ADV S, V16, P274-
dc.description.citedreferenceMin SK, 2006, J KOREAN MED SCI, V21, P69-
dc.description.citedreferenceYoon YS, 2006, J PEDIATR SURG, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.10.068-
dc.description.citedreferenceCheung MT, 2005, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V140, P993-
dc.description.citedreferenceDindo D, 2004, ANN SURG, V240, P205, DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae-
dc.description.citedreferenceHan HS, 2004, SURG LAPARO ENDO PER, V14, P157-
dc.description.citedreferenceGagner M, 2004, SURG CLIN N AM, V84, P451, DOI 10.1016/j.suc.2003.11.002-
dc.description.citedreferenceChen DW, 2004, SURGERY, V135, P386, DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2003.09.007-
dc.description.citedreferenceO`Rourke N, 2004, J GASTROINTEST SURG, V8, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.gassur.2003.11.008-
dc.description.citedreferenceCHEN P, 2004, SURG ENDOSC, V18, P717-
dc.description.citedreferenceHuang MH, 2003, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V98, P2655, DOI 10.1016/j.amjgastroenterol.2003.09.040-
dc.description.citedreferenceLaurent A, 2003, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V138, P763-
dc.description.citedreferenceLesurtel M, 2003, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V196, P236-
dc.description.citedreferenceTang CN, 2003, SURG ENDOSC, V17, P324, DOI 10.1007/s00464-001-8278-4-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee SK, 2001, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V53, P318-
dc.description.citedreferenceSun WB, 2000, SURGERY, V127, P493-
dc.description.citedreferenceYOON DK, 2000, J KOREAN SURG SOC, V58, P420-
dc.description.citedreferenceOtani K, 1999, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V189, P177-
dc.description.citedreferenceHAN HS, 1999, J KOREAN SURG SOC, V56, P106-
dc.description.citedreferenceJan YY, 1996, SURGERY, V120, P509-
dc.description.citedreferenceCHOI S, 1987, SURGERY, V101, P571-
dc.description.citedreferenceTAKADA T, SURG ENDOSC, V5, P192-
dc.description.citedreferenceCHO JY, ARCH SURG IN PRESS-
dc.description.tc4-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share