Publications
Detailed Information
The Clinical Use of Low-Dose Multidetector Row Computed Tomography for Breast Cancer Patients in the Prone Position
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Woo Jin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Seo, Bo Kyoung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cho, Pyung Kon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yie, Ann | - |
dc.contributor.author | Woo, Ok Hee | - |
dc.contributor.author | Son, Gil Soo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Guen Young | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cha, Sang Hoon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cho, Kyu Ran | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-07-02T01:43:47Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-07-02T01:43:47Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010-12 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER; Vol.13(4); 357-365 | ko_KR |
dc.identifier.issn | 1738-6756 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/78043 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To investigate the clinical use of low-dose multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) for staging of invasive breast cancers with patients in the prone position. Methods: Three hundred twenty-two patients with 334 pathologically-verified breast cancers had low-dose MDCT breast imaging in the prone position for tumor staging before treatment between May 2006 and June 2010. We designed an additional computed tomography table pad with a hole for prone positioning. Patients lay prone on the table pad and the breasts were positioned within the rectangular hole. We obtained dynamic breast imaging from the lower neck to the lung base with the following parameters: 120 kVp, 50 mAs, and 3-mm reconstruction intervals. We evaluated the extent of the primary tumor, lymph nodal status, and distant metastasis in lung or bone, then assessed tumor staging based on the TNM classification of breast cancer. The assessed staging compared to the pathologic results for diagnostic accuracy. Results: Among the 334 invasive breast cancers, the overall diagnostic accuracy of tumor staging was 88.3% and the accuracy values of each tumor stage were 89.6% in T1, 90.8% in T2, 81.0% in T3, and 89.3% in T4. The overall diagnostic accuracy of lymph nodal staging was 86.3% and the accuracy values in each nodal stage were 82.9% in NO, 88.0% in N1, 89.7% in N2, and 93.3% in N3. Based on breast computed tomography scans, we detected distant metastases in 30 cases (7 lungs, 10 bones, 7 lungs and bones, and 6 livers). Conclusion: Low-dose MDCT scanning for invasive breast cancer patients in the prone position is a feasible imaging technique for tumor staging before treatment to evaluate primary breast tumors, lymph nodes, lungs, or thoracic bones with reduced radiation doses. | ko_KR |
dc.language.iso | en | ko_KR |
dc.publisher | KOREAN BREAST CANCER SOC | ko_KR |
dc.subject | Breast | ko_KR |
dc.subject | Carcinoma | ko_KR |
dc.subject | Multi-detector row computed tomography | ko_KR |
dc.title | The Clinical Use of Low-Dose Multidetector Row Computed Tomography for Breast Cancer Patients in the Prone Position | ko_KR |
dc.type | Article | ko_KR |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 이우진 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 서보경 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 조평곤 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 조규란 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 우옥희 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 차상훈 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 손길수 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 이근영 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4048/jbc.2010.13.4.357 | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER | - |
dc.description.citedreference | EDGE SB, 2010, AJCC CANC STAGING MA | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Lim HI, 2010, BREAST CANCER RES TR, V119, P163, DOI 10.1007/s10549-009-0525-8 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Mortellaro VE, 2009, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V30, P309, DOI 10.1002/jmri.21802 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Hurwitz LM, 2009, AM J ROENTGENOL, V192, P244, DOI 10.2214/AJR.08.1066 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Kang DK, 2008, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V32, P583 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Taira N, 2008, JPN J CLIN ONCOL, V38, P419, DOI 10.1093/jjco/hyn040 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Lindfors KK, 2008, RADIOLOGY, V246, P725 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Kuhl C, 2007, BREAST, V16, pS34, DOI 10.1016/j.breast.2007.07.014 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Alvarez S, 2006, AM J ROENTGENOL, V186, P1342, DOI 10.1021/2214/AJR.05.0936 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | *AM COLL RAD, 2006, ACR PRACT GUID PERF, P217 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Seo BK, 2005, CLIN IMAG, V29, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.clinimag.2004.04.029 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Inoue T, 2005, BREAST CANCER RES TR, V89, P119, DOI 10.1007/s10549-004-1477-7 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Inoue M, 2003, AM J ROENTGENOL, V181, P679 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | NAKAHARA H, 2002, RADIAT MED, V20, P17 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Boone JM, 2001, RADIOLOGY, V221, P657 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Uematsu T, 2001, BREAST CANCER RES TR, V65, P249 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | UEMATSU T, 2001, BREAST CANC, V8, P125 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Cheng JC, 1998, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V41, P607 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Akashi-Tanaka S, 1998, BREAST CANCER RES TR, V49, P79 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Bone B, 1997, ACTA RADIOL, V38, P489 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | HeywangKobrunner SH, 1997, EUR J RADIOL, V24, P94 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Obdeijn IMA, 1996, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V6, P849 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Hagay C, 1996, RADIOLOGY, V200, P631 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | 1991, ANN ICRP, V21, P1 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | *NAT COMPR CANC NE, NCCN GUID TREATM CAN | - |
dc.description.tc | 0 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.