Publications
Detailed Information
A comparison of retrobulbar block, sub-Tenon block, and topical anesthesia during cataract surgery
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ryu, Jung-Hee | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Minsuk | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bahk, Jae-Hyon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Do, Sang-Hwan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Yong-Chul | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheong, Il-Young | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-07-03T08:42:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-07-03T08:42:34Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009-04 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY; Vol.19 2; 240-246 | ko_KR |
dc.identifier.issn | 1120-6721 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/78320 | - |
dc.description.abstract | PURPOSE. This randomized, double-blinded, prospective study was performed to compare the intraoperative hemodynamic variables and the patient-reported outcomes, such as intra-and postoperative analgesia and patient satisfaction, of retrobulbar block, sub-Tenon block, and topical anesthesia during cataract surgery under monitored anesthesia care. METHODS. Eighty-one patients, ASA physical status I-III, undergoing elective cataract surgery under monitored anesthesia care, aged between 43 and 78 years, were randomly assigned to three groups: retrobulbar block (group R), sub-Tenon block (group S), or topical anesthesia (group T). Three minutes after the start of monitored anesthesia care with lidocaine-propofol-remifentanil mixture, an ophthalmologist performed regional anesthesia. Intraoperative hemodynamics, pain score, and patients` satisfaction with the anesthetic experiences were recorded by a study-blinded anesthesiologist. RESULTS. Mean arterial pressure and heart rate in group R were significantly higher than those in groups S and T during and just after the regional block (p<0.05). Group R required smaller dosage of patient controlled sedation and fewer supplemental bolus doses than groups S and T (p<0.05). On the other hand, group S showed the highest satisfaction scores among the three groups (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS. Sub-Tenon block seems to be better than retrobulbar block and topical anesthesia in patient satisfaction though adequate analgesia was achieved after retrobulbar block during cataract surgery under monitored anesthesia care. (Eur J Ophthalmol 2009; 19: 240-6) | ko_KR |
dc.language.iso | en | ko_KR |
dc.publisher | WICHTIG EDITORE | ko_KR |
dc.subject | Analgesia | ko_KR |
dc.subject | Sub-Tenon block | ko_KR |
dc.subject | Topical anesthesia | ko_KR |
dc.subject | Patient satisfaction | ko_KR |
dc.subject | Cataract surgery | ko_KR |
dc.subject | Retrobulbar block | ko_KR |
dc.title | A comparison of retrobulbar block, sub-Tenon block, and topical anesthesia during cataract surgery | ko_KR |
dc.type | Article | ko_KR |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 류정희 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 김민숙 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 박재현 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 도상환 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 정일영 | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 김용철 | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Davison M, 2008, ANESTH ANALG, V106, P345 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Fang ZT, 2006, J CLIN ANESTH, V18, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.08.007 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Tan CSH, 2005, EUR J ANAESTH, V22, P413 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Fung D, 2005, ANESTH ANALG, V100, P1637, DOI 10.1213/01.ANE.0000154203.00434.23 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Fung D, 2005, ANESTH ANALG, V100, P1644, DOI 10.1213/01.ANE.0000154206.81132.B9 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Ruschen H, 2005, BRIT J OPHTHALMOL, V89, P291, DOI 10.1136/bjo.2004.052167 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | THOMAS WF, 2005, MILLERS ANESTHESIA, P2708 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | KALLIO H, 2005, BEST PRACT RES CLIN, V19, P215 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Balkan BK, 2004, EUR J OPHTHALMOL, V14, P473 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Rewari V, 2002, ANAESTH INTENS CARE, V30, P433 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Katz J, 2001, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V108, P1721 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Zafirakis P, 2001, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V27, P873 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Jacobi PC, 2000, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V118, P1037 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Boezaart A, 2000, J CLIN ANESTH, V12, P58 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Rosenfeld SI, 1999, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V106, P1256 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Avramov MN, 1997, ANESTH ANALG, V85, P566 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Tramer M, 1997, BRIT J ANAESTH, V78, P247 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Jolliffe DM, 1997, EYE, V11, P858 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | Patel BCK, 1996, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V103, P1196 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | DAVIS DB, 1994, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V20, P327 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | ROSOW C, 1993, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V79, P875 | - |
dc.description.citedreference | REGO MMS, 1988, CURR OPIN ANESTHESIO, V11, P601 | - |
dc.description.tc | 8 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
- There are no files associated with this item.
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.