Publications

Detailed Information

Altered resting-state connectivity in subjects at ultra-high risk for psychosis: an fMRI study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorShim, Geumsook-
dc.contributor.authorOh, Jungsu S-
dc.contributor.authorJung, Wi Hoon-
dc.contributor.authorJang, Joon Hwan-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Euitae-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Jung-Seok-
dc.contributor.authorKwon, Jun Soo-
dc.contributor.authorJung, Myung Hun-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Hye-Yoon-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Chi-Hoon-
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-04T05:52:04Z-
dc.date.available2012-07-04T05:52:04Z-
dc.date.issued2010-10-11-
dc.identifier.citationBEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN FUNCTIONS; Vol.6 ; -ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn1744-9081-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/78417-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Individuals at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis have self-disturbances and deficits in social cognition and functioning. Midline default network areas, including the medial prefrontal cortex and posterior cingulate cortex, are implicated in self-referential and social cognitive tasks. Thus, the neural substrates within the default mode network (DMN) have the potential to mediate self-referential and social cognitive information processing in UHR subjects. Methods: This study utilized functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate resting-state DMN and task-related network (TRN) functional connectivity in 19 UHR subjects and 20 matched healthy controls. The bilateral posterior cingulate cortex was selected as a seed region, and the intrinsic organization for all subjects was reconstructed on the basis of fMRI time series correlation. Results: Default mode areas included the posterior/anterior cingulate cortices, the medial prefrontal cortex, the lateral parietal cortex, and the inferior temporal region. Task-related network areas included the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, supplementary motor area, the inferior parietal lobule, and middle temporal cortex. Compared to healthy controls, UHR subjects exhibit hyperconnectivity within the default network regions and reduced anti-correlations (or negative correlations nearer to zero) between the posterior cingulate cortex and task-related areas. Conclusions: These findings suggest that abnormal resting-state network activity may be related with the clinical features of UHR subjects. Neurodevelopmental and anatomical alterations of cortical midline structure might underlie altered intrinsic networks in UHR subjects.ko_KR
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by World Class University program through the
Korea Science and Engineering Foundation funded by the Ministry of
Education, Science and Technology (R32-10142) and grant from the Seoul National University Hospital Research Fund (No: 03-2009-013).
ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherBIOMED CENTRAL LTDko_KR
dc.titleAltered resting-state connectivity in subjects at ultra-high risk for psychosis: an fMRI studyko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor심금숙-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor오정수-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor정이훈-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor장준환-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최치훈-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김의태-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박혜윤-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최정석-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor정명훈-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor권준수-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1744-9081-6-58-
dc.citation.journaltitleBEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN FUNCTIONS-
dc.description.citedreferenceChang C, 2009, NEUROIMAGE, V47, P1381, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.048-
dc.description.citedreferenceGentili C, 2009, BRAIN RES BULL, V79, P409, DOI 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2009.02.002-
dc.description.citedreferenceShin KS, 2009, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V65, P1071, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.12.024-
dc.description.citedreferenceFox MD, 2009, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V101, P3270, DOI 10.1152/jn.90777.2008-
dc.description.citedreferenceNelson B, 2009, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V33, P807, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.01.002-
dc.description.citedreferenceTakahashi T, 2009, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V66, P366-
dc.description.citedreferenceBroyd SJ, 2009, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V33, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.09.002-
dc.description.citedreferenceWhitfield-Gabrieli S, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P1279, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0809141106-
dc.description.citedreferenceFornito A, 2008, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V64, P758, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.05.032-
dc.description.citedreferenceYung AR, 2008, SCHIZOPHR RES, V105, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.schres.2008.07.012-
dc.description.citedreferenceAuer DP, 2008, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V26, P1055, DOI 10.1016/j.mri.2008.05.008-
dc.description.citedreferencePomarol-Clotet E, 2008, PSYCHOL MED, V38, P1185, DOI 10.1017/S0033291708003565-
dc.description.citedreferenceChoi JS, 2008, PROG NEURO-PSYCHOPH, V32, P1326, DOI 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.04.011-
dc.description.citedreferenceSchilbach L, 2008, CONSCIOUS COGN, V17, P457, DOI 10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.013-
dc.description.citedreferenceNelson B, 2008, SCHIZOPHRENIA BULL, V34, P381, DOI 10.1093/schbul/sbm094-
dc.description.citedreferenceAddington J, 2008, SCHIZOPHR RES, V99, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.schres.2007.10.001-
dc.description.citedreferenceChung YS, 2008, SCHIZOPHR RES, V99, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.schres.2007.11.012-
dc.description.citedreferenceBuckner RL, 2008, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1124, P1, DOI 10.1196/annals.1440.011-
dc.description.citedreferenceShim G, 2008, AUST NZ J PSYCHIAT, V42, P678-
dc.description.citedreferenceZhou Y, 2007, SCHIZOPHR RES, V97, P194, DOI 10.1016/j.schres.2007.05.029-
dc.description.citedreferenceBluhm RL, 2007, SCHIZOPHRENIA BULL, V33, P1004, DOI 10.1093/schbul/sbm052-
dc.description.citedreferenceTaylor SF, 2007, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V61, P1171, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.11.029-
dc.description.citedreferenceBorgwardt SJ, 2007, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V61, P1148, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.08.009-
dc.description.citedreferenceNiendam TA, 2007, SCHIZOPHRENIA BULL, V33, P772, DOI 10.1093/schbul/sbm020-
dc.description.citedreferenceGarrity AG, 2007, AM J PSYCHIAT, V164, P450-
dc.description.citedreferenceHarrison BJ, 2007, SCHIZOPHR RES, V91, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.schres.2006.12.027-
dc.description.citedreferenceMenzies L, 2007, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V64, P156-
dc.description.citedreferenceMason MF, 2007, SCIENCE, V315, P393, DOI 10.1126/science.1131295-
dc.description.citedreferencePINKHAM AE, 2007, COGNIT NEUROPSYCHIAT, V12, P198-
dc.description.citedreferenceLee KH, 2006, AM J PSYCHIAT, V163, P1926-
dc.description.citedreferenceBurns J, 2006, WORLD PSYCHIATRY, V5, P77-
dc.description.citedreferenceNorthoff G, 2006, NEUROIMAGE, V31, P440, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.002-
dc.description.citedreferenceStephan KE, 2006, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V59, P929, DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.10.005-
dc.description.citedreferenceAmodio DM, 2006, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V7, P268, DOI 10.1038/nrn1884-
dc.description.citedreferenceLund TE, 2006, NEUROIMAGE, V29, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.005-
dc.description.citedreferenceYung AR, 2005, AUST NZ J PSYCHIAT, V39, P964-
dc.description.citedreferenceFransson P, 2005, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V26, P15, DOI 10.1002/hbm.20113-
dc.description.citedreferenceFox MD, 2005, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V102, P9673, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0504136102-
dc.description.citedreferenceD`Argembeau A, 2005, NEUROIMAGE, V25, P616, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.048-
dc.description.citedreferenceMorey RA, 2005, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V62, P254-
dc.description.citedreferenceHawkins KA, 2004, SCHIZOPHR RES, V67, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.schres.2003.08.007-
dc.description.citedreferenceYucel M, 2003, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V182, P518-
dc.description.citedreferenceKim JJ, 2003, AM J PSYCHIAT, V160, P919-
dc.description.citedreferenceFrith U, 2003, PHILOS T R SOC B, V358, P459, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2002.1218-
dc.description.citedreferenceYung AR, 2003, SCHIZOPHR RES, V60, P21-
dc.description.citedreferenceAdolphs R, 2003, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V4, P165, DOI 10.1038/nrn1056-
dc.description.citedreferenceParnas J, 2003, COMPR PSYCHIAT, V44, P121, DOI 10.1053/comp.2003.50017-
dc.description.citedreferencePantelis C, 2003, LANCET, V361, P281-
dc.description.citedreferenceKelley WM, 2002, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V14, P785-
dc.description.citedreferenceLawrie SM, 2002, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V51, P1008-
dc.description.citedreferenceMiller TJ, 2002, AM J PSYCHIAT, V159, P863-
dc.description.citedreferenceGusnard DA, 2001, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V2, P685-
dc.description.citedreferenceShenton ME, 2001, SCHIZOPHR RES, V49, P1-
dc.description.citedreferenceGusnard DA, 2001, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V98, P4259-
dc.description.citedreferenceRaichle ME, 2001, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V98, P676-
dc.description.citedreferenceMoller P, 2000, SCHIZOPHRENIA BULL, V26, P217-
dc.description.citedreferenceFrith CD, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P1692-
dc.description.citedreferenceFIRST MB, 1998, STRUCTURED CLIN INTE-
dc.description.citedreferenceParnas J, 1998, NEUROL PSYCHIAT BR, V6, P97-
dc.description.citedreferenceKIM JS, 1995, KOREAN J CLIN PSYCHO, V14, P111-
dc.description.citedreference*AM PSYCH ASS, 1994, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT-
dc.description.citedreferenceBIRCHWOOD M, 1990, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V157, P853-
dc.description.citedreferenceBROTHERS L, 1990, CONCEPTS NEUROSCIENC, V1, P27-
dc.description.citedreferenceMCGORRY PD, 1988, COMPR PSYCHIAT, V29, P575-
dc.description.citedreferenceKAY SR, 1987, SCHIZOPHRENIA BULL, V13, P261-
dc.description.citedreferenceANDREASEN N, 1984, SCALE ASSESSMENT POS-
dc.description.citedreferenceANDREASEN NC, 1983, SCALE ASSESSMENT NEG-
dc.description.citedreferenceANNETT M, 1970, BRIT J PSYCHOL, V61, P303-
dc.description.citedreferenceJUNG WH, SCHIZOPHR B-
dc.description.tc3-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share