Browse

A Constructive Approach to Intensional Contexts : Remarks on the Metaphysics of Model Theory

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Authors
Hausser, Roland R.
Issue Date
1982
Publisher
서울대학교 언어교육원
Citation
어학연구, Vol.18 No.2, pp. 337-372
Abstract
The basic distinction between extensional and intensional contexts is one of different
denotation conditions (truth conditions). This difference in denotation conditions has been related to a fundamental question of semantic theory, namely: what do expressions of natural 'language denote? Most authors assume that in ex tensional contexts expressions denote 'real objects.' Since the rules of substitutivity of identicals and existential generalization do not hold in intensional contexts (cf. section 1), they are thus forced to postulate that in intensional contexts expressions denote something else. Frege, for example, assumes a de notational ambiguity between 'Bedeutung' and 'Sinn', Russell between 'primary occurrences' and 'secondary occurrences', Quine between 'proper occurrences' and 'accidental occurrences', and Montague between 'extensions' and 'intensions.
ISSN
0254-4474
Language
English
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/85664
Files in This Item:
Appears in Collections:
Language Education Institute (언어교육원)Language Research (어학연구)Language Research (어학연구) Volume 18 Number 1/2 (1982)
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse