Browse

A Constructive Approach to Intensional Contexts : Remarks on the Metaphysics of Model Theory

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorHausser, Roland R.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-07T07:17:14Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-07T07:17:14Z-
dc.date.issued1982-
dc.identifier.citation어학연구, Vol.18 No.2, pp. 337-372ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0254-4474-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/85664-
dc.description.abstractThe basic distinction between extensional and intensional contexts is one of different
denotation conditions (truth conditions). This difference in denotation conditions has been related to a fundamental question of semantic theory, namely: what do expressions of natural 'language denote? Most authors assume that in ex tensional contexts expressions denote 'real objects.' Since the rules of substitutivity of identicals and existential generalization do not hold in intensional contexts (cf. section 1), they are thus forced to postulate that in intensional contexts expressions denote something else. Frege, for example, assumes a de notational ambiguity between 'Bedeutung' and 'Sinn', Russell between 'primary occurrences' and 'secondary occurrences', Quine between 'proper occurrences' and 'accidental occurrences', and Montague between 'extensions' and 'intensions.
ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisher서울대학교 언어교육원ko_KR
dc.titleA Constructive Approach to Intensional Contexts : Remarks on the Metaphysics of Model Theoryko_KR
dc.typeSNU Journalko_KR
dc.citation.journaltitle어학연구-
Appears in Collections:
Language Education Institute (언어교육원)Language Research (어학연구)Language Research (어학연구) Volume 18 Number 1/2 (1982)
Files in This Item:
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse