Publications
Detailed Information
On Raising : A Reananysis of S-Deletion
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Hong Bae | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-01-07T07:19:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-01-07T07:19:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1984 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 어학연구, Vol.20 No.2, pp. 107-120 | ko_KR |
dc.identifier.issn | 0254-4474 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/85704 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The paper discusses a number of problems in connection with Chomsky's S-deletion approach to the analysis of 'exceptional Case-marking' verbs such as believe, and proposes a new approach to the effect that English contains a ø complementizer that can govern and assign Case, unlike Kayne's(1981) ø complementizer, and that a verb may subcategorize a non-argument as its complements, contradicting Chomsky's claim, "Complements of X are always θ-positions." The new approach is proved to meet requirements of the principles in the GB theory: theθ-criterion, the Case Filter, the Projection Principle and the Binding theory.
0. In this paper, I will argue that English constructions acounted for by means of S-deletion mechanism are not an exceptional phenomenon which calls for a special treatment in syntax. In particular, I will demonstrate that constructions involving the so-called 'exceptional Case-marking' verbs like believe may be accounted for in a principled way by assuming that they require a particular type of infinitival complement clause, just as 'ordinary' verbs such as want and try require their respective type of infinitival complement clause as in (1) and (2): | ko_KR |
dc.language.iso | en | ko_KR |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 언어교육원 | ko_KR |
dc.title | On Raising : A Reananysis of S-Deletion | ko_KR |
dc.type | SNU Journal | ko_KR |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.