Publications

Detailed Information

On Raising : A Reananysis of S-Deletion

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hong Bae-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-07T07:19:00Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-07T07:19:00Z-
dc.date.issued1984-
dc.identifier.citation어학연구, Vol.20 No.2, pp. 107-120ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0254-4474-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/85704-
dc.description.abstractThe paper discusses a number of problems in connection with Chomsky's S-deletion approach to the analysis of 'exceptional Case-marking' verbs such as believe, and proposes a new approach to the effect that English contains a ø complementizer that can govern and assign Case, unlike Kayne's(1981) ø complementizer, and that a verb may subcategorize a non-argument as its complements, contradicting Chomsky's claim, "Complements of X are always θ-positions." The new approach is proved to meet requirements of the principles in the GB theory: theθ-criterion, the Case Filter, the Projection Principle and the Binding theory.

0. In this paper, I will argue that English constructions acounted for by means of S-deletion mechanism are not an exceptional phenomenon which calls for a special treatment in syntax. In particular, I will demonstrate that constructions involving the so-called 'exceptional Case-marking' verbs like believe may be accounted for in a principled way by assuming that they require a particular type of infinitival complement clause, just as 'ordinary' verbs such as want and try require their respective type of infinitival complement clause as in (1) and (2):
ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisher서울대학교 언어교육원ko_KR
dc.titleOn Raising : A Reananysis of S-Deletionko_KR
dc.typeSNU Journalko_KR
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share