Publications

Detailed Information

A Categorial Analysis of Dyrbal, An Ergative Case - Marking Language

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKang, Beom-mo-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-07T07:24:46Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-07T07:24:46Z-
dc.date.issued1985-
dc.identifier.citation어학연구, Vol.21 No.2, pp. 199-214ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0254-4474-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/85732-
dc.description.abstractDowty's (1982a, b) treatment of grammatical relations in terms of compositional characters of functors(verbs) and arguments (NPs) seem to have problems with respect to case-marking languages such as Korean and Japanese. Particularly, his "Inverse Lexicalization Hypothesis" for the analysis of Dyrbal, an ergative language, is not adequate when we consider various linguistic facts barefully (the pronominal system and conjunction structures in Dyrbal, and some typological considerations, etc.). One version of Montague Grammar developed by Lee (1982) for the treatment of Korean, a case-marking language, works better in the analysis of Dyrbl. So, I argue for the latter system and present a categorial analysis of Dyrbal which does not accept "Inverse Lexicalization Hypothesis" but which treat grammatical processes (e.g., Passive) as category changing rules.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisher서울대학교 언어교육원ko_KR
dc.titleA Categorial Analysis of Dyrbal, An Ergative Case - Marking Languageko_KR
dc.typeSNU Journalko_KR
dc.citation.journaltitle어학연구-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share