Browse

The Meanings of the Two Passives in Korean

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Keedong-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-07T07:30:28Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-07T07:30:28Z-
dc.date.issued1987-
dc.identifier.citation어학연구, Vol.23 No.2, pp. 185-201ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0254-4474-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/85768-
dc.description.abstractThe present paper deals with distinguishing the meanings of the two passives in Korean, thereby revealing a systematic nature of the Korean verb system. One passive form is made with the infix and the other with the auxiliary verb cita. In productivity the two passives are different from each other. The auxiliary passive is productive whereas the infix passive is not. However, they have been regarded to be synonymous. It is claimed in this paper that the two passives have different meanings. The infix passive denotes spontaneous and accidental process whereas the auxiliary passive denotes processes which are carried out intentionallyko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisher서울대학교 언어교육원ko_KR
dc.titleThe Meanings of the Two Passives in Koreanko_KR
dc.typeSNU Journalko_KR
dc.citation.journaltitle어학연구-
Appears in Collections:
Language Education Institute (언어교육원)Language Research (어학연구)Language Research (어학연구) Volume 23 Number 1/4 (1987)
Files in This Item:
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse