Browse

Non-Clause-Bounded A-Movement: A Cross-Linguistic Study of ECM Constructions

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Jeong-Me-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-07T07:39:04Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-07T07:39:04Z-
dc.date.issued1993-12-
dc.identifier.citation어학연구, Vol.29 No.4, pp. 495-534ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0254-4474-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/85979-
dc.description.abstractIn standard GB theory, it is commonly believed that A-movement is strongly local, being necessarily clause-bounded and the clause-boundness of A-movement is mandated by various central principles of the theory, such as ECP and Binding Theory. Our goal in this paper is to show that this, in fact, is not the case, i.e., that there are languages which allow nonclause-bounded A-movement, through a cross-linguistic study of the socalled ECM constructions. In this paper, we show that ECM constructions in some languages do involve movement, i.e., raising, and that movement can be non-clause-bounded. Also discussed are various theoretical problems non-clause-bounded A-movement cause in standard GB-theory and how they can be solved.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisher서울대학교 언어교육원ko_KR
dc.titleNon-Clause-Bounded A-Movement: A Cross-Linguistic Study of ECM Constructionsko_KR
dc.typeSNU Journalko_KR
dc.citation.journaltitle어학연구-
Appears in Collections:
Language Education Institute (언어교육원)Language Research (어학연구)Language Research (어학연구) Volume 29 Number 1/4 (1993)
Files in This Item:
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse