Publications
Detailed Information
Intransitive Resultative Constructions and Fake Objects
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Chang-Su | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-01-07T07:41:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-01-07T07:41:31Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1995-12 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 어학연구, Vol.31 No. pp. 657-686 | ko_KR |
dc.identifier.issn | 0254-4474 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/86028 | - |
dc.description.abstract | An unergative verb takes a fake object in resultative use though it cannot in non-resultative use. This paper proposes that a fake object is an internal argument of the main verb. To explain the fact that a fake object atisfies Case Filter, we reinterpret Burzio's Generalization. This leads us, against Chomsky (1995), to argue that [ + assign Accusative Case] is not an intrinsic feature of the verb. Verb's capacity of assigning the Accusative Case crucially relies on whether the verb has an external 8-role to assign. So an unergative verb is always a potential Accusative Case assigner since it takes an external argument. In this paper, we also clarify that the FI Principle forces the appearance of a fake object. | ko_KR |
dc.language.iso | en | ko_KR |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 언어교육원 | ko_KR |
dc.title | Intransitive Resultative Constructions and Fake Objects | ko_KR |
dc.type | SNU Journal | ko_KR |
dc.citation.journaltitle | 어학연구 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.