Publications

Detailed Information

On Modularity of L1 Acquisition and L2 Learning: Reviewing Three Different Approaches

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPark, Hyu-Yong-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-07T08:01:19Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-07T08:01:19Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citation어학연구, Vol.47 No.1, pp. 101-121ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0254-4474-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/86466-
dc.description.abstractThis paper discusses the issues of modularity, Universal Grammar (UG), and transferability in children mother tongue (L1) acquisition and second language (L2) learning. In doing so, this paper discusses nativismsmodularity hypothesis and its three major characteristics; further, this paper introduces controversies on modularity from sociocultural perspectives and connectionism. By comparing and critically analyzing the different approaches to modularity, UG, and transferability of L1 knowledge to L2 acquisition, this paper emphasizes overcoming the modular account of human language and expanding understanding on L1/L2 acquisition or learning. Finally, this paper discusses the pedagogic implications of language modularity, especially the role of L1 on L2 learning in classroom settings.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisher서울대학교 언어교육원ko_KR
dc.subjectmodularityko_KR
dc.subjecttransferabilityko_KR
dc.subjectUniversal Grammarko_KR
dc.subjectnativismko_KR
dc.subjectUG accessko_KR
dc.subjectconnectionismko_KR
dc.titleOn Modularity of L1 Acquisition and L2 Learning: Reviewing Three Different Approachesko_KR
dc.typeSNU Journalko_KR
dc.citation.journaltitle어학연구-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share