Publications

Detailed Information

-어야의 의미와 서법

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author염재일-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-07T08:03:39Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-07T08:03:39Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citation어학연구, Vol.49 No.1, pp. 1-24ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0254-4474-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/86508-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, I give the semantics and pragmatic properties of eya conditional. I claim that a conditional with eyameans that the antecedent clause is a downward-bound sufficient condition for the consequent clause. And in a conditional with eya the consequent clause is a topic. From this we can explain why an eyaconditional does not allow other moods than the declarative and interrogative. This also explains why a conditional with eyadoes not allow an interrogative with a wh-phrase in the consequent clause. A conditional with eya does not allow a modal operator used to ask about the hearer willingness to accept the speaker offering. An eyaconditional can be used with a concessive meaning, but its semantics is the same as that of a normal conditional use. The only difference is the expected result determined by the context, which is reflected in the ordering of scalar alternaives for the antecedent clause.ko_KR
dc.language.isokoko_KR
dc.publisher서울대학교 언어교육원ko_KR
dc.subject-eyako_KR
dc.subjectconditionalko_KR
dc.subjectconcessiveko_KR
dc.subjectscalarko_KR
dc.title-어야의 의미와 서법ko_KR
dc.typeSNU Journalko_KR
dc.citation.journaltitle어학연구-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share