Publications
Detailed Information
다국적민사소송법가안에 대한 일반적 고찰 : A Critical Look at the ALI Transnational Rules of Civil Procedure
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 송상현 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-09-07T03:20:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-09-07T03:20:12Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2000 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 법학, Vol.40 No.3, pp. 1-49 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-222X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/8788 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article is to critically analyze and discuss the Draft of Transnational
Rules of Civil Procedure presented by the American Law Institute in April, 1999. The draft is an endeavor to internationally harmonize civil procedure rules by which business disputes are litigated. It is thus the version to overcome the fundamental differences between common law and civil law systems. The uniqueness of the American system, represented by the broad discovery and jury trial, is not much reflected on the draft. In the process the procedural similarities between two systems are much discussed: Standards for personal as well as subject-matter jurisdictions; qualifications for a judge; notice to defendant; how to formulate claims; fact-finding based on evidence; expert testimony; rules for deliberation and decision; rules for appellate review; and finality of judgment. Among these the rules of personal jurisdiction, notice, and recognition of judgment are quite similar that an international convention can embrace them. With respect to other issues reliance can be placed on the local rules. The procedural differences between two systems are as follows: 1) civil law litigation proceeds through a series of short hearing sessions, while common law litigation has a preliminary or pre-trial stage, and then a trial at which all the evidence is received consecutively. 2) In the civil law system the judge has responsibility to develop the evidence and articulate the legal concepts that should govern decision, whereas in the common law system the advocates has the same responsibility. 3) A civil law judgment rendered by the court of first instance is subject to more extensive reexamination than a common law judgment with respect to facts as well as law. 4) Judges in civil law systems usually start legal career at the young age and serve for life. Therefore they lack the experience as a practitioner. The common law judges are selected from the bar at the later stage of their life. The article also discusses rules for formulating claims, discovery, procedure at plenary hearing and second instance review and finality of judgment. Finally analyses, comparisons, comments and criticisms are made on each article of the Draft, wherever applicable. | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 법학연구소 | - |
dc.subject | 美國法曹協會(American Law Institute) | - |
dc.subject | 다국적민사소송법 | - |
dc.subject | 비지니스 분쟁 | - |
dc.subject | business dispute | - |
dc.title | 다국적민사소송법가안에 대한 일반적 고찰 | - |
dc.title.alternative | A Critical Look at the ALI Transnational Rules of Civil Procedure | - |
dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | Song, Sang Hyeon | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | 법학 | - |
dc.citation.endpage | 49 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.pages | 1-49 | - |
dc.citation.startpage | 1 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 40 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.