Publications

Detailed Information

최근의 한국민법전개정작업 : Recent Revision Work on the Korean Civil Code

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author양창수-
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-10T04:21:57Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-10T04:21:57Z-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citation법학, Vol.43 No.3, pp. 47-78-
dc.identifier.issn1598-222X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://lawi.snu.ac.kr/-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/9111-
dc.description.abstractThis article was originally written and presented in Japanese at Tokyo

University in June of 2002 and at Kyoto University the following month. Its

purpose was to inform Japanese civil law scholars of the revision work on the

Korean Civil Code ("KCC") in detail, which has been in progress since

February 1999.

The thesis first opens with the formation of the Civil Code Revision

Committee("Committee"), and its agenda. In the discussion, I try to articulate

the historical context of this revisionary work. While the original codification

of the KCC in the 1950's was planned and executed by legal practitioners

who had been trained under the Japanese colonial rule, the current reforms are

being mainly handled by university professors, most of them in their 40's or

50's, some of whom have had practical experiences as judges. One of the

salient features of the Committee is the fact that most of its members studied

law in Germany after graduating from law colleges in Korea. Though the

stages of their life when they went abroad, the conditions as well as the

length of their stay may vary, this common feature may explain why many of

the proposals made contain a very German touch.

The article goes on to deal with the items discussed by the Committee and

the results of these debates. Its reformative proposals for the KCC are

extensive and far-reaching. From the tentative draft, six provisions were chosen

to show, as clearly as possible, the characteristics of this revisionary work,

e.g. the proposal on the general principle of KCC, mistakes, restrictions on the

presumption of the possessor's intention of holding as owner, restrictions on

so-called de more superficies, guarantee contract, and finally, termination of

the contract.

I conclude this article with some lessons and/or personal opinions that I

formed during my time and experience as a member of the Committee.
-
dc.language.isoko-
dc.publisher서울대학교 법학연구소-
dc.subject한국의 민법전은 1958년 2월 22일에 공포-
dc.subject민법개정위원회-
dc.subject민법안심의소위원회-
dc.title최근의 한국민법전개정작업-
dc.title.alternativeRecent Revision Work on the Korean Civil Code-
dc.typeSNU Journal-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorYang, Chang Su-
dc.citation.journaltitle법학-
dc.citation.endpage78-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.pages47-78-
dc.citation.startpage47-
dc.citation.volume43-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share