Publications

Detailed Information

Responding to Public Concerns over Investor State Dispute Settlement Clauses In APEC Free Trade Agreements

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorHenry, Laura-
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-28T00:29:45Z-
dc.date.available2014-04-28T00:29:45Z-
dc.date.issued2012-06-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Korean Law, Vol.12 No.2, pp. 197-218-
dc.identifier.issn1598-1681-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/91455-
dc.description.abstractPrepared for a recent presentation for APEC Member Economies, this paper surveys how APEC Member Economies have responded to public-interest-based criticisms in ISDS through multilateral negotiations, treaty and investment agreement drafting and administrative measures. While no other APEC Member besides Australia has decided to forgo ISDS altogether, the language in APEC investment agreements shows clear progress towards acceptance of major public interest concerns in recent years. At the same time, there is no sign that a consensus is emerging among Members to amend the basic institutional features of ISDS.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBK 21 law-
dc.subjectinvestor state arbitration-
dc.subjectmultilateral investment agreement-
dc.subjectexceptions clauses-
dc.subjecttrade sustainability impact assessment-
dc.subjectarbitrator conflict of interest-
dc.titleResponding to Public Concerns over Investor State Dispute Settlement Clauses In APEC Free Trade Agreements-
dc.typeSNU Journal-
dc.citation.journaltitleJournal of Korean Law-
dc.citation.endpage218-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.pages197-218-
dc.citation.startpage197-
dc.citation.volume12-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share