Browse

고정함축과 전제
Conventional Implicature and Presupposition

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author윤영은-
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T01:30:36Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T01:30:36Z-
dc.date.issued2000-09-
dc.identifier.citation어학연구, Vol.36 No.3, pp. 545-572ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn0254-4474-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/92316-
dc.description본 논문은 두뇌한국 21 인문사회분야 이화 서강 언어학 교육 연구단 수행 목표에 대한 결과물의 일부로 출판되었음.ko_KR
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates two important semantic phenomena, conventional implicature and presupposition. Bach (1999: 327, 365) proposes that "there is no each thing as conventional implicature," and that "the propositions that are alleged to be conventional implicatures are actually aspects of what is said." He also suggests that the expressions that have been thought to generate conventional implicatures do not seem to contribute to the truth-conditional aspects of the sentence, since their contribution is secondary to the main point of the utterance. This paper reexamines the nature of the so-called conventional implicatures. It further searches into the issue of whether conventional implicature and presupposition are identical notions.ko_KR
dc.language.isokoko_KR
dc.publisher서울대학교 언어교육원ko_KR
dc.title고정함축과 전제ko_KR
dc.title.alternativeConventional Implicature and Presuppositionko_KR
dc.typeSNU Journalko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorYoon, YoungEun-
dc.citation.journaltitle어학연구-
Appears in Collections:
Language Education Institute (언어교육원)Language Research (어학연구)Language Research (어학연구) Volume 36 Number 1/4 (2000)
Files in This Item:
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse