Publications
Detailed Information
불완전이용발명의 이용관계 성립 여부에 관한 고찰 : Does a Patented Invention Omitted Any of the Elements of the Prior Patent Constitute Infringement?
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 구대환 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-09-25 | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-09-25 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 법학, Vol.45 No.3, pp. 66-93 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-222X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://lawi.snu.ac.kr/ | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/9828 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Where working a patented invention would infringe another person's patented
invention under an application filed before the filing date of the patent application, the patentee may not work the patented invention commercially without a license from the owner of the earlier patent. If the other party refuses permission without justifiable reasons or permission is impossible to obtain, the patentee may request a trial for the grant of a non exclusive license with the scope necessary to work the patented invention. Thus, the patentee can work his patented invention and the owner of the earlier patent can reap royalty from the patentee. However, it is questionable whether working a patented invention having not all of the elements of the earlier patent could infringe the earlier one. Basically infringement happens when a patented invention having all of the elements (or equivalents) of the earlier patent works. Proponents argue that because omitting unimportant elements is easy to a person in the field and it is impossible to write patent claims anticipating all occasions, infringement should be acknowledged. Opponents assist that because the scope of right of a patented invention is determined by its claims and every element of a claim is essential to the invention, working a patented invention omitted any of the elements in a claim of the prior patent does not constitute infringement. They criticize proponents in... | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | 이 논문은 서울대학교 법학발전재단 출연 법학연구소 기금의 2004학년도 학술연구비
의 지원을 받았음. | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 법학연구소 | - |
dc.subject | 특허발명의 구성요소 | - |
dc.subject | 요소 생략 | - |
dc.subject | 생략발명의 해당요건 | - |
dc.subject | 특허제도는 독점적 권리 | - |
dc.title | 불완전이용발명의 이용관계 성립 여부에 관한 고찰 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Does a Patented Invention Omitted Any of the Elements of the Prior Patent Constitute Infringement? | - |
dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | Koo, Dae Hwan | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | 법학 | - |
dc.citation.endpage | 93 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.pages | 66-93 | - |
dc.citation.startpage | 66 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 45 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.