Publications
Detailed Information
괴델정리의 법이론적 함의 : The Implication of Godel`s Incompleteness Theorem
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 안성조 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-10-07T04:20:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-10-07T04:20:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 법학, Vol.49 No.4, pp. 683-731 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-222X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://lawi.snu.ac.kr/ | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/10255 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The Critical Legal Studies(CLS) movement has for several years criticized
mainstream legal scholars belief that the law can determine outcomes in legal disputes. CLS charge that this vision of the law is an illusion; legal formalism does not exist. According to them judges are always free to make decisions as they see fit, relying on their own predilections, insights and life experience. They offers a thorough theoretical deconstruction of contemporary American legal thought arguing that law is, and can only be, indeterminate. To support this argument, CLS scholars have offered extensive commentary on the limitation of human language. Language is subjective and imprecise, they argue, traits which the law (being dependent on language) must share. Given the inherent limitations of language, the law cannot uniformly and objectively inform and constrain judicial decisions. In addition to linguistic arguments, they asserted that mathematical theories and proofs have surfaced in debates over indeterminacy in the law. Anthony DAmato, for example has argued that two related-though distinct- mathematical results, the Löwenheim-Skolem Theorems and Gödels Incompleteness Theorem, demonstrate that even though language is precise and objective, the law still must prove inherently indeterminate. The Löwenheim-Skolem Theorems, according to him, reveal that a case can be decided either way consistent with any legal theory. Furthermore, Gödels Incompleteness Theorem proves that legal, textual and linguistic demonstration must propagate propositions that can neither be proved nor disproved. * Full-time Lecturer, College of Law, Sun Moon University. | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 법학연구소 | - |
dc.subject | 괴델정리 | - |
dc.subject | 법의 불확정성 | - |
dc.subject | 논리실증주의 | - |
dc.subject | 뢰벤하임-스콜렘 정리 | - |
dc.subject | 직관의 정당화 | - |
dc.subject | Lowenheim-Skolem Theorems | - |
dc.subject | Indeterminacy Thesis | - |
dc.subject | Critical Legal Studies | - |
dc.subject | Legal Formalism, Legal Indeterminacy | - |
dc.subject | 비트겐슈타인 | - |
dc.title | 괴델정리의 법이론적 함의 | - |
dc.title.alternative | The Implication of Godel`s Incompleteness Theorem | - |
dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | Ahn, Seong Jo | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | 법학 | - |
dc.citation.endpage | 731 | - |
dc.citation.number | 4 | - |
dc.citation.pages | 683-731 | - |
dc.citation.startpage | 683 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 49 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.