Publications

Detailed Information

자회사(子會社)의 임직원(任職員)이 외국법인(外國法人)인 모회사(母會社)로부터 받은 주식매수선택권(株式買受選擇權)과 관련된 소득과세(所得課稅)의 방법(方法) -대법원 2007. 10. 25. 선고 2007두1941 판결- : How to Tax a Stock Option Granted by a Foreign Parent Company -A Review on the Supreme Court Decision, 2007 Du 1941 of October 25, 2007-

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author윤지현-
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-07T04:22:11Z-
dc.date.available2009-10-07T04:22:11Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citation법학, Vol.49 No.4, pp. 732-771-
dc.identifier.issn1598-222X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://lawi.snu.ac.kr/-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/10256-
dc.description.abstractThe Korean Supreme Court (hereinafter the Court) rendered on October 25,

2007, a landmark decision on when and how to tax a stock option granted by a

foreign parent company to an employee who provides her service for a Korean

subsidiary or a Korean branch of a foreign subsidiary.

Firstly, the Court in this decision held that the grant of a stock option itself

is not a taxable event, but the spread between the fair market value of the

shares and the option price (hereinafter the Gain) should be taxed as employment

income when the option is exercised, which conclusion was already

reached in an unpublished 2006 decision of the Court.

Secondly, the Court held that, as long as the grant of a stock option is to a

certain extent connected with employment, then the Gain should be qualified as

employment income regardless of whether or not the taxpayer is employee of

the grantor of the stock option.

Thirdly and lastly, the Court accepted the position long taken by the tax

authorities that, if the stock option is granted by a foreign parent company, then

the Gain falls within the category of Eul-type employment income, which

means that the Korean subsidiary, who is the legal employer of the taxpayer, is

not subject to any withholding requirement under the Korean tax law.

I believe that the first part of the holding is correct because, under the

Korean income tax law, not just any betterment of ones economic position is

recognized as income, but it is always necessary to find the most appropriate...
-
dc.description.sponsorship이 논문은 서울대학교 법학발전재단 출연 법학연구소 기금의 2008학년도 학술연구비

의 보조를 받았음.
-
dc.language.isoko-
dc.publisher서울대학교 법학연구소-
dc.subject스톡옵션-
dc.subject주식매수선택권-
dc.subject실현주의-
dc.subject권리확정주의-
dc.subjectEmployment Income-
dc.subjectRealization Principle-
dc.subjectTaxable Event-
dc.subjectStock Option-
dc.subjectPersonal Income Tax-
dc.title자회사(子會社)의 임직원(任職員)이 외국법인(外國法人)인 모회사(母會社)로부터 받은 주식매수선택권(株式買受選擇權)과 관련된 소득과세(所得課稅)의 방법(方法) -대법원 2007. 10. 25. 선고 2007두1941 판결--
dc.title.alternativeHow to Tax a Stock Option Granted by a Foreign Parent Company -A Review on the Supreme Court Decision, 2007 Du 1941 of October 25, 2007--
dc.typeSNU Journal-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorYoon, Ji Hyun-
dc.citation.journaltitle법학-
dc.citation.endpage771-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.pages732-771-
dc.citation.startpage732-
dc.citation.volume49-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share