Publications

Detailed Information

State and Finance in Economic Development

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLapavitsas, Costas-
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-21T08:06:09Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-21T08:06:09Z-
dc.date.issued1997-10-
dc.identifier.citationSeoul Journal of Economics, Vol.10 No.4, pp. 415-438-
dc.identifier.issn1225-0279-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/1115-
dc.description.abstractThe development successes of East Asia and South East Asia Have encouraged the emergence of a theoretical critique of the role of freely-operating markets in the process of development. Move recently, Stiglitz and Uy have brought together several of the current's analytical strands, at the same time drawing support from economic theory by relying on the literature on market failure, particularly that on asymmetric information. However, it is also necessary to identify some analytical and theoretical weakness that bedevil the current's intellectual output. The most fundamental problem is the absence of an analytical framework within which to analyze the interplay of economics. political, and social forces in the process of development. The main claim of this paper is that appropriate analytical principles for this task are to be found instead in the approach of radical political economy.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherInstitute of Economic Research, Seoul National University-
dc.subjectfreely-operating market-
dc.subjectinterplay of economics-
dc.subjectStiglitz and Uy-
dc.titleState and Finance in Economic Development-
dc.typeSNU Journal-
dc.citation.journaltitleSeoul Journal of Economics-
dc.citation.endpage438-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.pages415-438-
dc.citation.startpage415-
dc.citation.volume10-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share