Publications

Detailed Information

Perception Variance of TACT Productivity between General Contractor and Subcontractors : 시공자와 협력업체 간 택트 생산성 인식차이 분석

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor박문서-
dc.contributor.author주선우-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-13T06:34:35Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-13T06:34:35Z-
dc.date.issued2016-02-
dc.identifier.other000000133774-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/118654-
dc.description학위논문 (박사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 건축학과, 2016. 2. 박문서.-
dc.description.abstractTo complete various types of finish works with higher quality in much less time, TACT, which was mostly used for high-rise buildings, has been adapted to meet the needs for systematic schedule management in construction sites. However, the effectiveness of adapting TACT has not been shown as expected due to the different perspectives on productivity from both general contractor and subcontractors based on unforeseen conditions according to the types of site. Furthermore, not enough theoretical backgrounds, empirical data, and systematic approaches to solve the fundamental problems caused by each participants different views on productivity has produced obstacles for establishing effective solutions.
Therefore, this research aims to analyze the main possible reasons for having different point of views regarding productivity among the various participants of construction sites using TACT based on literature review, site survey, and interviews. Also, a case study was conducted to propose obtainable productivity (OP) regression equation and productivity achievement ratio (PAR) with reduction factors (RFs) and actual productivity (AP) data from an actual construction site.
The proposed outcome may assist general contractors converting output management with PPC to productivity management with actual data using PAR. On the other hand, subcontractors would be able to estimate theory-based maximum productivity of construction sites with TACT by using OP. The PAR will enhance the communication between general and sub-contractors for their decision making process. Finally, the main RFs derived from PAR could be used as essential keys for productivity management to increase the economical and operational effectiveness of the construction project.
The CC value is implemented with regression equation from the OP computation process for participants limitation factors and coefficient of regression. Using the implementation, the priority of the productivity management factors was evaluated.
The research founds the theoretically explanation for perspective variance from the TACT productivity participants aspects. Also, the TACT application cases were compared with traditional cases to demonstrate the impact of scheduling methodology on productivity efficiency. The continuous productivity measures on site will more accurately resolve OP and PAR values, managing the productivity from the participants perspectives.
-
dc.description.tableofcontentsChapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background 1
1.2 Problem Description 3
1.3 Research Objectives and Scope 5
1.4 Dissertation Outline 6

Chapter 2 TACT Scheduling Method 11
2.1 Process Management of Finish Work 11
2.2 TACT Scheduling Method 13
2.2.1 The Concept of TACT Scheduling Method 13
2.2.2 Three Types of TACT Scheduling Method 16
2.2.3 Previous TACT Cases 19
2.3 Related Research Efforts 21
2.4 Summary 24

Chapter 3 PAR as a Productivity Indicators 25
3.1 Productivity Management in Construction Project 25
3.1.1 Productivity 25
3.1.2 Productivity Management 26
3.2 Factors Affecting Labor Productivity 29
3.3 Productivity Indicators 33
3.4 PAR as a Productivity Indicator 35
3.4.1 The Concept of Productivity Achievement Ratio 35
3.4.2 The Procedure of Calculating PAR 38
3.4.3 PAR as a Productivity Indicator 42
3.5 Summary 44

Chapter 4 TACT Productivity Analysis 47
4.1 Investigation on Participants Perception of TACT 47
4.1.1 Perspective of General Contractor 51
4.1.2 Perspective of Subcontractor 52
4.2 Perception Variance of TACT Productivity 53
4.2.1 Perception of General Contractor 53
4.2.2 Perception of Subcontractors 55
4.2.3 Perception Variance of TACT Productivity between General Contractor and Subcontractor 56
4.3 TACT Productivity Analysis using PAR 56
4.3.1 Deduction of Reduction Factors 57
4.3.2 Calculating OP and PAR 59
4.4 Summary 62

Chapter 5 Case Study 65
5.1 Case Description 65
5.2 Deduction of RFs for Case Study 67
5.3 Results of Case Study 71
5.4 Summary and Discussions 74

Chapter 6 Conclusions 79
6.1 Research Results 79
6.2 Research Contributions 80
6.3 Limitations and Future Research 81

References 83

Appendices 93

Abstract (Korean) 111
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent3065895 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoko-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectTACT-
dc.subjectProductivity-
dc.subjectProductivity Influence Factor-
dc.subjectProductivity Achievement Ratio-
dc.subjectProductivity Indicator-
dc.subject.ddc690-
dc.titlePerception Variance of TACT Productivity between General Contractor and Subcontractors-
dc.title.alternative시공자와 협력업체 간 택트 생산성 인식차이 분석-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.description.degreeDoctor-
dc.citation.pagesix, 112-
dc.contributor.affiliation공과대학 건축학과-
dc.date.awarded2016-02-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share