Publications

Detailed Information

Essays on Earnings Management: International Evidence

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor최종학-
dc.contributor.author최아름-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-13T07:27:36Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-13T07:27:36Z-
dc.date.issued2016-08-
dc.identifier.other000000136081-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/119389-
dc.description학위논문 (박사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 경영학과, 2016. 8. 최종학.-
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation is comprised of two essays on earnings management. The first essay, entitled The Effect of Earnings Management and Legal Regime on Audit Fee Decisions: International Evidence, investigates whether the auditors incorporate their clients real earnings management (REM) in addition to accrual-based earnings management (AEM) into their pricing decisions. Using 79,904 firm-year observations from 24 countries, I find a positive association between audit fees and the magnitude of both AEM and REM, suggesting that auditors perceive that AEM and REM increase audit complexity and audit risk, thus exerting more effort on the clients that manage earnings through AEM or REM. This positive relation between AEM/REM and audit fees is more pronounced in countries with a stronger legal regime due to the heightened litigation risk in these countries. Furthermore, the association between AEM and audit fees is greater than that between REM and audit fees, suggesting that auditors are more cautious in detecting and restricting AEM than they are in detecting and restricting REM. Additional analyses show that these findings are more pronounced for Big 4 clients or risky clients. Overall, the results provide valuable insights into how auditors behave when their clients engage in risk-increasing earnings manipulations.
The second essay, entitled The Effect of Ownership Divergence and Legal Regime on Cost Stickiness: International Evidence, examines whether the degree of cost stickiness depends on the ownership divergence of ultimate owners and the strength of country-level legal regime. Using 52,361 firm-year observations from 22 countries, I find that the magnitude of cost stickiness decreases as the ownership divergence increases. It is because firms with large ownership divergence are more likely to engage in earnings management. Second, the magnitude of cost stickiness decreases as country-level legal regime gets stronger. Since strong legal regime restricts managers empire building incentives, it renders a decrease in cost stickiness in strong legal regime countries. And the degree of cost stickiness is the smallest in firms with large ownership divergence and in countries with strong legal regime. This paper, by examining the effect of ownership structure and legal regime on cost behavior as well as its underlying mechanism, broadens the understanding of sticky costs behavior and contributes to the growing body of literatures on convergence of financial and managerial accounting.
-
dc.description.tableofcontentsEssay1. The Effect of Earnings Management and Legal Regime on Audit Fee Decisions: International Evidence 1
1. Introduction 2
2. Summary of prior studies and hypotheses development 7
2.1. Theoretical model for audit pricing 7
2.2. AEM/REM and audit pricing 8
2.3. AEM/REM and audit pricing subject to legal regime 11
2.4. Difference in audit pricing for AEM versus REM 13
3. Research design 15
3.1. Proxy for the magnitude of AEM (AM) and REM (RM) 15
3.2. Proxy for country-level legal regime (LAW) 16
3.3. Model specification and other variables 18
4. Sample, data, and empirical results 20
4.1. Sample and data 20
4.2. Results for the effect of AEM/REM on audit fees 22
4.3. Results for the effect of AEM/REM on audit fees subject to legal regime 24
5. Additional analyses and robustness tests 28
5.1. Additional analysis: Auditor characteristics 28
5.2. Additional analysis: Client characteristics 31
5.3. Robustness checks 33
6. Conclusion 38
References 40
Appendix 46

Essay 2. The Effect of Ownership Divergence and Legal Regime on Cost Stickiness: International Evidence 61
1. Introduction 63
2. Summary of prior studies and hypotheses development 67
2.1. Economic explanation for sticky costs 67
2.2. Empire building explanation for sticky costs 68
2.3. Earnings management explanation for sticky costs 70
2.4. Hypothesis development 72
3. Research design 78
4. Sample, data, and empirical results 83
4.1. Sample and data 83
4.2. Empirical results for H1 84
4.3. Empirical results for H2 89
4.4. Empirical results for H3 92
5. Additional analyses and robustness tests 95
5.1. Each REM proxy 95
5.2. Meeting or beating earnings benchmark 97
5.3. Robustness tests 98
6. Conclusion 102

References 104

Appendix 109

국문 초록 131
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent887455 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectAccrual-based earnings management-
dc.subjectReal earnings management-
dc.subjectAudit fees-
dc.subjectLegal regime-
dc.subjectCost Stickiness-
dc.subjectOwnership Divergence-
dc.subjectEmpire Building-
dc.subject.ddc658-
dc.titleEssays on Earnings Management: International Evidence-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.description.degreeDoctor-
dc.citation.pages140-
dc.contributor.affiliation경영대학 경영학과-
dc.date.awarded2016-08-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share