Publications

Detailed Information

Handling Qualitiy and PIO Analyses with State Space Predictor considering Time Delay of UAV : 무인기 시간지연을 고려한 상태공간 예측기 이용 비행성 및 PIO 분석 연구

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor김유단-
dc.contributor.author오승현-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-14T03:36:00Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-14T03:36:00Z-
dc.date.issued2015-02-
dc.identifier.other000000024784-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/123799-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 기계항공공학부, 2015. 2. 김유단.-
dc.description.abstractModern digital flight control systems have the time delay due to various sources including the data-link transport time delay between a vehicle and a ground pilot. Time delay not only degrades HQ (Handling Quality) but can also induce PIO (Pilot-Induced Oscillation), which may cause mission failure or critical accident during performing complicated missions such as precision approach, air refuel, and combat maneuver.
This study analyzes HQ and PIO considering time delay of the UAS (Unmanned Aircraft Systems). Predictive pitch compensation is applied to improve the HQ degraded by the time delay.
Even though the autonomous level of UAS becomes higher, a ground pilot is still required for safety and mission control. Therefore, UAS should be able to satisfy military requirements of HQ.
In this study, the state space predictor is applied to the UAS to compensate for the effect of time delay. Neal-Smith, Bandwidth, and Ralph-smith criteria are used to evaluate the HQ and PIO. Numerical simulation is performed to demonstrate the performance of the time-delay compensation
-
dc.description.abstractthe state space predictor improves the HQ of the UAS and reduces the PIO tendency compared to the lead compensator.-
dc.description.tableofcontentsChapter
1 Introduction
1.1 UAS Pilot
1.2 Handling Quality
1.3 Literature Survey
1.4 Contributions
1.5 Thesis Overview
2 Handling Quality & Time Delay Compensation
2.1 Time Delay Effect on Human Control Behavior
2.1.1 Cooper-Harper Rating Scale
2.1.2 Time Delay
2.1.3 Time Delay Effect on Handling Quality Rating
2.2 Mathematical Methods for Estimating Handling Quality
2.2.1 Neal-Smith Criterion
2.2.2 Bandwidth (BW) Criterion
2.3 Time Delay Compensation Methods
2.3.1 Lead Compensator (LC)
2.3.2 Velocity Predictor Algorithm
2.3.3 State Space Predictor (SSP)
3 PIO Tendency
3.1 PIOs
3.2 PIO & Handling Quality
3.3 Ralph Smith Criterion
4 Numerical Simulation
4.1 Simulation Configuration
4.2 Neal-Smith Criterion Results
4.2.1 Lead Compensator
4.2.2 State Space Predictor
4.3 Bandwidth Criterion Results
4.3.1 Lead Compensator
4.3.2 State Space Predictor
4.3.3 Frequency & Time Domain Analysis
4.4 Ralph Smith Criterion Results
4.4.1 Lead Compensator
4.4.2 State Space Predictor
4.5 Numerical Simulation Results Analysis
5 Conclusion & Future Work
5.1 Conclusion
5.2 Future Work
References
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent2984272 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectHandling Quality-
dc.subjectTime Delay-
dc.subjectCompensation-
dc.subjectPIO-
dc.subjectUAV-
dc.subject.ddc621-
dc.titleHandling Qualitiy and PIO Analyses with State Space Predictor considering Time Delay of UAV-
dc.title.alternative무인기 시간지연을 고려한 상태공간 예측기 이용 비행성 및 PIO 분석 연구-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.citation.pagesxi, 64-
dc.contributor.affiliation공과대학 기계항공공학부-
dc.date.awarded2015-02-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share