Publications

Detailed Information

운동 참여 증대를 위한 효과적인 헬스커뮤니케이션 전략: 확장병행과정이론을 중심으로 : Effective Health Communication Strategy to Enhance the Publics Participation in Physical Activities : A Test of Extended Parallel Process Model

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor김기한-
dc.contributor.author윤리라-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-19T02:13:20Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-19T02:13:20Z-
dc.date.issued2012-08-
dc.identifier.other000000004924-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/127263-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 체육교육과, 2012. 8. 김기한.-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to examine how individuals perceived risk and efficacy level of the health message affect the degree of message acceptance. Based upon the extended parallel process theory, it was hypothesized that there would be an interaction effect between perceived risk level and efficacy level on the attitude and intention to participate in sport activities. To be specific, it was predicted that, in the high-efficacy perceived group, the attitude toward and intention to participate in sport activities would increase as individuals' perceptions of risk increases-
dc.description.abstractin contrast, in the low efficacy group, attitude toward and intention to participate in sport activity was
predicted to decrease as individuals's perceptions of risk increases. In addition, it was predicted that, in the high-efficacy condition, individuals' perceptions of protection motivation would mediate the impacts of risk perception on the two dependent variables, whereas, in the low-efficacy condition, it would be the perceptions of the defensive motivation that mediate the impacts of risk perceptions on the two dependent
variables.To verify these hypotheses, a 2(risk)-by-2(efficacy) full factorial experiment were conducted. A total 160 participants were randomly assigned to one of four experimental conditions. At first, they were exposed to experimental stimulus, then the independent
variables(perceived risk and efficacy level of the message), the dependent variables(the attitude and intention toward the participation of sport activity), and the mediating variables(the degree of protection and defensive motivation arousal) were measured.
The collected data were analyzed by two-way ANCOVA and Structural Equation Modeling method using SPSS 20 and Amos 20. The results showed that there was an interaction effect between perceived risk and efficacy level on the attitude toward, and intention toward participation in sport activity. Also, under the high-efficacy condition, the attitude and intention toward participating in sport activities was higher when
perceived risk was high rather than low. However, under the low-efficacy condition, the attitude and intention toward participating in sport activities were higher when perceived risk was low rather than high. These findings support the hypotheses predicting interaction between risk perception and efficacy level.
In addition the mediating hypotheses involving protection motivation and defensive motivation were supported. Specifically, under the high-efficacy condition, the perceived risk positively affected the degree of protection motivation, which in turn positively affected the degree of attitude and intention toward the participation of sport activity.
Also, under the low-efficacy condition, the perceived risk positively affected the degree of defensive motivation, which in turn negatively affected the degree of attitude and intention toward the participation of sport activity.
-
dc.description.abstract본 연구의 목적은 확장병행과정모델을 이용한 운동참여 권고 메시지가 수용자의 운동참여태도 및 의도에 미치는 영향을 확인함으로써 운동참여를 증대시키기 위한 효과적인 메시지를 살펴보는 것이다. 이를 위해 운동에 대한 효능감이 높은 집단과 낮은 집단에서의 메시지 위협 수준이 메시지 수용도에 미치는 영향 및 각 집단에서 메시지 위협 수준과 메시지 수용도 사이의 관계에서 방어동기 및 보호동기의 매개역할을 확인하고자 하였다.
본 연구는 실험을 통해 진행하였으며, 연구 참여자는 서울 및 수도권 거주 20대 성인 남녀로써, 각 실험집단에 40명씩 무선할당 하였다. 연구 참여자들로부터 회수된 자료는 SPSS 20.0 프로그램과 AMOS 20.0 프로그램을 통해 분석되었으며, 구체적으로는 변인의 신뢰도 검증(reliability analysis), 표본의 일반적인 특성을 파악하기 위한 빈도분석(frequency analysis)과 기술통계(descriptive analysis)분석, 조작 점검을 위한 독립표본 t 검정, 메시지 위협수준과 효능감수준의 운동참여태도 및 의도에 대한 상호작용 효과 검증을 위한 이원공변량분석(two-way ANCOVA), 일원공변량분석(one-way ANCOVA), 메시지 처리과정에서의 위협수준에 따른 운동참여태도 및 의도 사이의 보호동기와 방어동기의 매개역할 확인을 위한 확인적요인분석(CFA, confirmatory factor analysis)과 구조방정식 모형(SEM, structural equation model)을 통한 경로분석이 실시되었다.
이상의 연구방법을 통해 확인된 연구결과는 다음과 같다.
첫째, 운동에 대한 효능감을 높게 인지한 집단에서는 위협수준과 운동참여태도 및 의도간 정적관계가 나타났고, 운동에 대한 효능감을 낮게 인지한 집단에서는 위협수준과 운동참여태도 및 의도간 부적관계가 나타났다.
둘째, 운동에 대한 효능감을 높게 인지한 집단에서는 위협과 보호동기간 정적관계 및, 보호동기와 메시지수용도간 정적관계(p<.01)가 나타남으로써, 위협과 메시지수용도 사이의 보호동기의 매개역할이 확인되었다. 하지만, 방어동기가 위협과 메시지 수용도 사이의 매개역할을 하지 않을 것이라는 예측과는 달리, 위협과 방어동기 사이에는 부적관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다.
셋째, 운동에 대한 효능감을 낮게 인지한 집단에서는 위협과 방어동기간 정적관계가 나타났고, 방어동기와 메시지수용도간 부적관계(p<.01)가 나타남으로써, 위협과 메시지수용도 사이의 방어동기의 매개역할이 확인되었다. 하지만, 보호동기가 위협과 메시지수용도 사이에서 매개 역할을 하지 않을 것이라는 예측과는 달리, 위협과 보호동기 사이의 부적관계가 나타났다.
결론적으로, 본 연구를 통해 운동에 대한 효능감을 높게 인지한 수용자의 경우, 메시지의 위협수준이 높아질수록 운동참여에 대한 태도 및 의도가 높아지며, 메시지의 위협수준이 낮아질수록 운동참여에 대한 태도 및 의도가 낮아짐을 확인하였고, 반대로 운동에 대한 효능감을 낮게 인지한 수용자의 경우, 메시지의 위협수준이 높아질수록 운동참여에 대한 태도 및 의도가 낮아지며, 메시지의 위협수준이 낮아질수록 운동참여에 대한 태도 및 의도가 높아진다는 결론을 도출
할 수 있었다.
-
dc.description.tableofcontentsⅠ. 서 론 ···················································································· 1
1. 연구의 필요성 ····························································································· 1
2. 연구의 목적 ································································································· 5
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 ······································································· 7
1. 건강보도와 운동참여 현황········································································· 7
2. 공포소구이론(fear appeal theory) ···························································· 9
가. 공포동인모델(fear-as-acquired drive model) ······························· 10
나. 병행과정모델(parallel process model) ············································ 12
다. 보호동기모델(protection motivation model) ·································· 14
라. 확장병행과정모델(extended parallel process model) ·················· 17
마. 위험인식태도모델(risk perception attitude framework) ············· 22
바. 공포소구이론 종합 ·················································································24
3. 확장병행과정모델과 운동참여 권고 메시지의 설득력 ······················· 26
가. 위협········································································································· 26
나. 자기효능감····························································································· 31
Ⅲ. 연구가설 ··········································································· 38
1. 확장병행과정모델의 위협과 효능감수준이 메시지 수용도에
미치는 영향 ································································································ 38
2. 확장병행과정모델에서의 메시지처리과정에 따른 보호동기와
방어동기의 매개역할 ·············································································· 40
Ⅳ. 연구방법 ··········································································· 43
1. 실험설계 ······································································································· 43
2. 실험자극물(stimulus material) 제작····················································· 44
3. 변인측정 ······································································································· 46
4. 자료분석절차 ······························································································· 50
Ⅴ. 연구결과 ··········································································· 51
1. 연구대상자의 특성 ····················································································· 51
2. 조작점검(manipulation check) ································································ 52
3. 가설 1a 및 1b 검증 결과········································································ 53
가. 메시지 위협수준과 효능감수준이 운동참여태도에 미치는 영향 53
나. 메시지 위협수준과 효능감수준이 운동참여의도에 미치는 영향 55
4. 가설 2a, 2b 및 가설 3a, 3b 검증 결과 ················································ 57
가. 가설 2a 및 2b 모형검증 결과 ·························································· 57
나. 가설 3a 및 3b 모형검증 결과 ·························································· 62
Ⅵ. 논의 ···················································································· 66
1. 논의··············································································································· 66
2. 연구의 시사점 ····························································································· 71
Ⅶ. 결론 및 제언 ··································································· 73
1. 결론··············································································································· 73
2. 제언··············································································································· 75
* 참고 문헌 ··············································································77
* 부 록 ···············································································85
* Abstract ················································································96
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent1863075 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoko-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subject운동참여-
dc.subject스포츠참여-
dc.subject공포소구이론-
dc.subject확장병행과정모델-
dc.title운동 참여 증대를 위한 효과적인 헬스커뮤니케이션 전략: 확장병행과정이론을 중심으로-
dc.title.alternativeEffective Health Communication Strategy to Enhance the Publics Participation in Physical Activities : A Test of Extended Parallel Process Model-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorYun Lira-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.citation.pagesxii, 97-
dc.contributor.affiliation사범대학 체육교육과-
dc.date.awarded2012-08-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share