Publications

Detailed Information

The Ideological Evolution of Social Network Sites

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor한규섭-
dc.contributor.authorHyelim Lee-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-19T12:15:45Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-19T12:15:45Z-
dc.date.issued2013-02-
dc.identifier.other000000008402-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/134262-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 언론정보학과, 2013. 2. 한규섭.-
dc.description.abstractIn the last decade, online sphere has been extensively transformed while going through the other dimension of development. The Web 2.0 idea where people can be more actively involved on the site has been materialized through invention of a novel online platform such as microblog or Social Network Sites (e.g., Myspace, Tumblr, Facebook and Twitter). Social network sites (SNSs) play the most pivotal role in changing people's contemporary lifestyle and exercise a remarkable impact on the events of the real world. Clearly the performance in civic engagement through social network sites is also very impressive and uniquely Twitter has been regarded as a key. In this study, I examine how ideological polarization among users has changed over time in Twitter by data mining and network analysis. Here I analyze followership between legislators and users and then compare the extent of political polarization and concentration in the respective years. The results show ideological polarization and concentration in Twitter has been more or less alleviated over time although its extent of change is very small. The result also indicates the liberal users are more likely to follow liberal legislators. Furthermore this liberal's like-minded followership is found to get distinctively bigger as time goes on. The findings suggest users in new media sphere do not linger at a stable status but rather dynamically changed. The current study is expected to enrich the classic debates over online group polarization and to be one of cornerstones of new media study in political communication context.-
dc.description.tableofcontentsⅠ. INTRODUCTION
Ⅱ. LITERATURE
1. Ideological Polarization in Contemporary Politics
2. Polarization of Online Public Sphere
3. Twitter, the New Political Medium
Ⅲ. RESEARCH QUESTIONS & HYPOTHESES
1. The Concentration Hypothesis
2. The Polarization Hypothesis
Ⅳ. METHOD
1. The Network Representation
2. Measure: Classical Multidimensional Scaling (MDS)
3. Sample
Ⅴ. RESULTS
1. Analysis 1
2. Analysis 2
Ⅵ. DISCUSSION
1. Over-time Change of the Ideological Polarization in the Era of Social Media
2. Discrepancy Between Elite Polarization and Mass Polarization in Twitter
3. The Elemental Factors Swaying Followership of Users and Legislators
4. Limitations and Suggestions for Future Researches
Ⅶ. Reference
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent1373774 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectTwitter-
dc.subjectSocial Network Sites-
dc.subjectIdeological polarization-
dc.subjectIdeological segregation-
dc.subjectSelective exposure-
dc.subjectEvolution of social media-
dc.subject.ddc070-
dc.titleThe Ideological Evolution of Social Network Sites-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.citation.pages89-
dc.contributor.affiliation사회과학대학 언론정보학과-
dc.date.awarded2013-02-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share