Publications
Detailed Information
A Comparison between Factor Structure and Semantic Representation of Personality Test Items Using Latent Semantic Analysis : 잠재의미분석을 활용한 성격검사문항의 의미표상과 요인구조의 비교
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 김청택 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 박성준 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-07-19T12:21:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-07-19T12:21:24Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014-08 | - |
dc.identifier.other | 000000021435 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/134368 | - |
dc.description | 학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 심리학과, 2014. 8. 김청택. | - |
dc.description.abstract | In this thesis, semantic representation of personality test items is analyzed through LSA(Latent Semantic Analysis) and compared with factor structure to obtain implications for cognitive process of personality test item response.
Generally, a survey response process consists of four stages: comprehension, retrieval, judgement and response. Traditionally, in order to investigate construct validity of the survey the final response data have been evaluated through exploratory factor analysis. But problem may occur when analyzing factor structure using response data only because such approach can overlook inconsistency of stimulus and response. In order to solve this problem, we need to take a direct approach to semantic representation of personality test items using LSA. In study 1, using passages generated in a limited context describing Big Five personality traits, a weighted document-term matrix is decomposed to produce semantic space. Furthermore, this thesis suggests semantic similarity matrix based on semantic space to compare factor structure with semantic similarity. Using this matrix, study 2 and 3 shows resemblance between factor structure and semantic similarity of personality test items. The results shows stimulus-response consistency. Moreover, the result implies that construct validity of personality test can be evaluated with its semantic representation without analyzing response data. Also, factor structure can be interpreted as semantic similarity of items. | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Contents
Preface 1 Theoretical Background 4 Latent Semantic Analysis 5 Exploratory Factor Analysis 13 Comparison between two Analysis Method 14 Research Questions 16 A Framework for Comparison between Factor Structure and Semantic Representation 17 Study 1 23 Method 23 Result and Discussion 27 Study 2 30 Method 30 Result and Discussion 33 Study 3 36 Method 36 Result and Discussion 40 General Discussion 46 Reference 56 Appendix 61 Abstract in Korean 63 | - |
dc.format | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.extent | 1493412 bytes | - |
dc.format.medium | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 대학원 | - |
dc.subject | LSA | - |
dc.subject | EFA | - |
dc.subject | construct validity | - |
dc.subject | Big Five | - |
dc.subject | semantic similarity | - |
dc.subject | representation | - |
dc.subject.ddc | 150 | - |
dc.title | A Comparison between Factor Structure and Semantic Representation of Personality Test Items Using Latent Semantic Analysis | - |
dc.title.alternative | 잠재의미분석을 활용한 성격검사문항의 의미표상과 요인구조의 비교 | - |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | Sungjoon Park | - |
dc.description.degree | Master | - |
dc.citation.pages | vi, 66 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliation | 사회과학대학 심리학과 | - |
dc.date.awarded | 2014-08 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.