Publications

Detailed Information

A Study on Kengo Kumas Architecture of Anti-Object: Based on Martin Heideggers Notion of Thing : 쿠마 켄고 건축의 반 (反) 오브젝트의 관한 연구: 마르틴 하이데거의 물(物)의 이론을 중심으로

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor최두남-
dc.contributor.author웡키윤-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-31T07:30:44Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-31T07:30:44Z-
dc.date.issued2017-08-
dc.identifier.other000000145039-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/137313-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 공과대학 건축학과, 2017. 8. 최두남.-
dc.description.abstractThis thesis focuses on the study of Kengo Kumas architecture of anti-object which is based on Martin Heideggers notion of things. Kuma has always been perturbed by how contemporary architecture is being built separated from the surroundings and thus establish itself as distinct objects. People are now inclined to understand architecture as a separated object instead of something that is part of the nature.

The situation became more serious with the concrete method which dominated the world of architecture since the 20th century up until today. According to Kuma, the architecture as an edifice object is divided its relationship with the environment. This problem was further aggravated with the encouragement of formalism.

Kumas idea of eliminating the object from the surrounding as the method allowed him to achieve his notion of anti-object. The Kiro-san Observatory located
at Ehime Prefecture built in 1991 is the first project in which he literally erased the architecture by burying the whole building into the hill. He claims that the observatory is a void as compare to the idea of form taken by conventional architecture as an object.

Kuma developed the idea of anti-object by designing the building in smaller elements in order to reduce its bulkiness. In Kuma terms, he defined this technique as particlizing architecture. The idea of particlizing is not limited only to architectural elements but also as a philosophy in which he asserted that through particulating, we can avoid the dominance of a certain matter against others. This has led him to delve into the varieties of building materials to subdue the dominance of the concrete method.

However, his enthusiasm with building materials led him to the objectifying of the architecture instead of anti-object. According to Martin Heidegger, a German Philosopher, the more we attempt to explore the traits of something, the further we stay away from the essences of that particular thing. The thingness of the thing is only
reveals to us if we set it back to its original essence—its thing-being.

This study adopts the philosophy of Martin Heidegger in his phenomenology of thingness as the reference to discuss Kengo Kumas architecture of anti-object. According to Heidegger, the prevailing way of thinking in the West sees thing as a mere and separated object. Because of this, the direct human experience with the thing had been neglected. The notion of object is inadequate for Heidegger, too abstract, pretentious and detached from the daily experiences, and this is what the scientific world perspective propagandizes.

Kuma attempts to eliminate and reduce the massiveness of the object to reinstate the relationship between architecture and the natural environment. However,
according to Heidegger, the thing and the natural world are in an interdependent relationship situation. In other words, architecture is a thing that reinstates the
relationship between human beings and the natural world, by its appearance as a thing instead as a distinct object. Therefore, the relationship was reinstated through the appearance of thing instead through its status of distinct object.

A deeper understanding and discussion on Kumas architecture of anti-bject is provided in this study. The study also includes Kumas selected projects that
have been built during 1990 to 2000 to provide an understanding of how his strategies of anti-object developed over the course of his career.
-
dc.description.tableofcontentsChapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background 2
1.2 Research Objectives 5
1.2 Research Methodology 6

Chapter 2 Object, Anti-Object and Thing 9
2.1 Kengo Kumas Notion of Anti-Object 12
2.1.1 Background 12
2.1.2 The Commercialization of Housing Complexes 15
2.1.3 The Dominance of the Building Material 17
2.1.4 Influenced of Bruno Taut 21
2.2 Marin Heideggers Notion of Thing 24

Chapter 3 Strategies of Anti-Object 28
3.1 Introduction 29
3.2 The Elimination of the Object 31
3.2.1 The Kiro-san Observatory 31
3.2.2 The Kitakami Canal Museum 35
3.3 The Sensuousness of the Material 39
3.3.1 The Water/Glass House 39
3.4 Dematerialization 42
3.4.1 The Stone Museum 44
3.4.2 The Museum of Hiroshige 49
3.4.3 Kengo Kumas Strategy of Particlizing in the Wider Perspective 54

Chapter 4 Analysis on Kumas Notion of Anti-Object 57
4.1 Introduction 58
4.2 Architecture as an Identity of a Place 59
4.3 The Objectification of Building Material 64
4.4 The Domination use of a Single Technique 70
4.5 From Erasing Architecture to Organic Architecture 71

Chapter 5 Conclusion 75

Bibliography 77
Abstract (Korean) 81
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent5986601 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectKengo Kuma-
dc.subjectanti-object-
dc.subjectMartin Heidegger-
dc.subjectthing-
dc.subjectRelationship-
dc.subject.ddc690-
dc.titleA Study on Kengo Kumas Architecture of Anti-Object: Based on Martin Heideggers Notion of Thing-
dc.title.alternative쿠마 켄고 건축의 반 (反) 오브젝트의 관한 연구: 마르틴 하이데거의 물(物)의 이론을 중심으로-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorWong Kee Yun-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.contributor.affiliation공과대학 건축학과-
dc.date.awarded2017-08-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share