Publications

Detailed Information

Model for Incentivizing Cloud Service Federation : 클라우드 서비스 연합 장려 모델

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisorJorn Altmann-
dc.contributor.author주안파블로-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-31T07:41:57Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-31T07:41:57Z-
dc.date.issued2017-08-
dc.identifier.other000000144978-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/137454-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 공과대학 협동과정 기술경영·경제·정책전공, 2017. 8. Jorn Altmann.-
dc.description.abstractIn cloud computing, big service providers rule the market due to the economies of scale. A cloud federation presents a possible solution that allows small cloud providers to increase their competitiveness by making alliances with one another, thus forming a network with shared resources. Previous research suggests several different variables that may incentivize the participation of a selfish cloud provider, such as cost disparity, big competitors, and an efficient revenue sharing mechanism. It can be assumed that each individual cloud provider aims to maximize its profits and will choose to make alliances that provide it a constant benefit. For deciding on whether to federate or not, cloud providers take into consideration whether the federation-underlying revenue sharing will yield them an increase in profits.
The proposed study models the interactions between selfish heterogeneous agents in a repeated game that aims to maximize individual profits. Each agent starts off as an individual and is allowed to change its strategies and federate with other providers in order to improve its own performance. By looking at the speed of collaboration and overall profit of individuals, we can determine which specific incentives encourage the creation of cloud federations.
-
dc.description.tableofcontentsChapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Cloud Computing 1
1.2 Problem Description 2
1.3 Research Objective 3
Chapter 2 Related Work.. 4
Chapter 3 Experiment Formulation 8
3.1 Model 8
3.2 Experiment Setup 10
3.2.1 Revenue Sharing. 11
3.2.2 Capacity Disparity 14
3.2.3 Cost Disparity. 15
3.2.4 Big Competitor. 16
3.2.5 Volatile Demand. 17
Chapter 4 Results 17
4.1 Revenue Sharing Scenario 18
4.2 Capacity Disparity Scenario 19
4.3 Cost Disparity Scenario. 21
4.4 Big Competitor Scenario 22
4.5 Federation Behavior in Demand Peaks. 23
Chapter 5 Conclusions.. 24
5.1 Summary. 24
5.2 Discussion and Implications. 25
5.3 Limitations and Future Work 26
Bibliography. 27
Abstract. 29
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent721634 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectcloud federation-
dc.subjectrevenue sharing-
dc.subjectbusiness incentives-
dc.subjectSME-
dc.subjectrepeated game-
dc.subject.ddc658.514-
dc.titleModel for Incentivizing Cloud Service Federation-
dc.title.alternative클라우드 서비스 연합 장려 모델-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorJuan Pablo Romero Coronado-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.contributor.affiliation공과대학 협동과정 기술경영·경제·정책전공-
dc.date.awarded2017-08-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share