Publications

Detailed Information

Lobby Strategies of Interest Groups in the European Union : 유럽연합 내 이익집단들의 로비전략

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisorMoon, Hwy-Chang-
dc.contributor.author카밀리-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-31T07:46:20Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-31T07:46:20Z-
dc.date.issued2017-08-
dc.identifier.other000000145787-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/137511-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 국제대학원 국제학과, 2017. 8. Moon, Hwy-Chang.-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this thesis is to develop an understanding of how interest groups influence policy-makers, specifically in the European Union. The research is based on a theoretical framework of demand and supply for access goods and on the concepts of access strategy, voice strategy and frame strategy. Interest groups can use these different channels to gain access to EU decision-makers or to influence them indirectly through the general public. In order to investigate the research question, a qualitative methodological approach is carried out by performing a case study on the interest groups involved with the debate on genetically modified organisms in the European Union, based on data obtained from interviews and document analysis. The case study shows that both business and civil society interest groups are primarily using access strategies, due to the European Commission opting for a more diversified supply of access. Furthermore, framing plays a key role in the lobby process-
dc.description.abstractit can make or break an interest groups overall lobby strategy.-
dc.description.tableofcontentsIntroduction 1
1. Literature review 4
1.1 Lobbying 4
1.1.1 Definition of interest groups and lobbying 4
1.1.2 Why do interest groups lobby? 6
1.1.3 Strategies to influence policy-makers 12
1.1.3.1 Lobbying as a resource exchange model 12
1.1.3.1.1 Access as intermediate objective 13
1.1.3.1.2 Access goods 14
1.1.3.1.3 Demand and supply of access goods 16
1.1.3.2 Political strategies of interest groups 20
1.1.3.3 Framing 25
1.2 Lobbying in the European Union 27
1.2.1 European Commission 28
1.2.2 European Parliament 30
1.2.3 Council of the EU 32
1.2.4 Conclusion on EU access points 34
2. Methodology 35
3. Case study: GMOs in the EU 39
3.1 EU policy context of GMOs 41
3.1.1 EU policy towards GMOs 41
3.1.1.1 Legal framework 41
3.1.1.2 Legal basis 43
3.1.2 Context of GMO cultivation Directive 2015/412 44
3.1.2.1 General context 44
3.1.2.2 Different steps towards the GMO cultivation Directive 45
3.1.2.2.1 Dutch and Austrian proposal 45
3.1.2.2.2 European Commission proposal 46
3.1.3 Position of the legislative EU institutions 48
3.1.3.1 European Parliament 48
3.1.3.2 Council of the EU 50
3.1.4 EU interest groups in the field 52
3.1.4.1 Business interest groups 53
3.1.4.2 Civil society interest groups 54
3.2 Analysis of lobby behavior 55
3.2.1 Business lobby behavior 55
3.2.1.1 Which lobby strategies were used? 55
3.2.1.2 Access points 57
3.2.1.3 Impact on GMO cultivation Directive? 62
3.2.2 Civil society lobby behavior 64
3.2.2.1 Which lobby strategies were used? 65
3.2.2.2 Access points 67
3.2.2.3 Impact on GMO cultivation Directive? 70
3.3 The framing of GMOs in the EU 71
4. Final conclusion 74
5. Annexes 78
5.1 Annex 1 78
5.2 Annex 2 79
6. References 84
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent857248 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 국제대학원-
dc.subjectLobbying-
dc.subjectAccess strategies-
dc.subjectVoice strategies-
dc.subjectFraming-
dc.subjectEuropean Union-
dc.subjectGenetically modified organisms-
dc.subject.ddc327.17-
dc.titleLobby Strategies of Interest Groups in the European Union-
dc.title.alternative유럽연합 내 이익집단들의 로비전략-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.contributor.affiliation국제대학원 국제학과-
dc.date.awarded2017-08-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share