Publications

Detailed Information

Corruption in the Peruvian Judiciary: Focusing on the Provisional judges

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor김병섭-
dc.contributor.author카롤리나-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-31T08:41:18Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-31T08:41:18Z-
dc.date.issued2017-08-
dc.identifier.other000000145165-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/138196-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 행정대학원 행정학과, 2017. 8. 김병섭.-
dc.description.abstractCorruption in the judicial system undermines the rule of law and the ability to guarantee the rights of individuals. The fight for justice against corruption is not an easy task and therefore it is entrusted to the judges, the strengthening of justice with appropriate judicial proceedings-
dc.description.abstractunfortunately, this situation is not happening in the Peruvian courts. This paper is an inquiry into whether provisional judges are more vulnerable to corrupt practices in the judicial system with the main objective of tackling the corruption within the Peruvian Judiciary. It specifically aimed at analyzing and explaining the influence of corruption over provisional judges in the Peruvian courts, identifying factors that may threaten impartiality in the decisions of the provisional judges and thus the independence of the justice system.
Indeed, in order for the study to achieve the aforementioned objectives, this paper provided a theoretical background and conceptual definition to highlight the key concepts of judicial corruption, provisional judge as well as their derivatives. Besides, this paper assumed that bribery and undue political interference represent the most corrupt practices in the Judiciary. The paper used both qualitative and quantitative data in order to test the hypotheses by
means of a questionnaire intended for judges, courts clerk, and lawyer who had interacted with the judicial system as well as interviews with provisional and permanent judges.
Besides, after analyzing the collected data, the results have confirmed the hypothesis of this paper stating that provisional judges are more vulnerable to corruption. Thus, different internal and external factors that influence in this
issue were identified in order to give appropriate responses and make recommendations and policy implications to tackle and reduce corruption in the judicial system. Finally, the paper ends with conclusions that briefly confronts the objectives of the study and its findings and provide new
perspectives for future researchers.
-
dc.description.tableofcontentsCHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background of the study 1
1.2 Statement of the Problem 4
1.3 Significance of Study 6
1.6 Organization of the Study 8
CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF LITERATURE 9
2.1 The Judiciary 9
2.2 Corruption 12
2.3 Judicial Corruption 15
2.4 Causes of Corruption in Judiciary 19
2.5 Provisional Judges 23
CHAPTER 3:RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 28
3.1 Introduction 28
3.2 Sample Selection and Study Unit 28
3.3 Research Design 29
3.4 Framework of the Study 29
3.5 Objectives, Research Questions and Hypothesis 30
3.5.1 Objectives of the Study 30
3.5.2 Research Question 31
3.5.3 Hypotheses 32
3.6 Model and Variables 34
3.7 Operational Definitions 34
3.8 Sample Size 37
3.9 Data Collection Techniques and tools 37
3.10 Data Processing, Analysis, and Testing of Hypotheses 39
CHAPTER 4: BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTIC AND DESCRIPTIVE FINDINGS 41
4.1 Introduction 41
4.2 Background characteristics of the respondents 41
4.3 Descriptive Statistics 43
4.3.1 Judicial Corruption Perception Ranking Index 43
4.3.1.1 By Transparency International 43
4.3.1.2 By PROETICA 47
4.4 Corruption in the Judiciary 48
4.5 Causes, indicators and typologies of corruption in Judiciary 50
4.5.1 Causes of corruption in the Judiciary 51
4.5.2 Corruption indicators in the Judiciary 56
4.5.3 Typologies of corruption in the judiciary 57
4.6 Corruption and Judges 60
4.6.1 Understanding why our judges become corrupt 61
4.6.2 Motives behind bribery to the judges 62
4.6.3 Undue political influence and the judges 64
4.6.4 Corruption in different types of court proceedings and levels within the Judiciary 65
4.7 Provisional Judges 66
4.7.1 Provisional judges perception from Judges and Court clerks 67
4.7.1.1 Reasons for becoming provisional judges 67
4.7.1.2 Knowledge on Provisional Judges 68
4.7.2 Provisional judges perception from lawyer 73
4.8 Corruption and Provisional Judges 74
4.9 Number of provisional judges from 2001 to 2016 79
4.9.1 Total number of judges between provisional and permanent from 2001 to 2016 80
4.9.2 Total number of the Supreme Court judges between provisional and permanent from 2001 to 2016 81
4.9.3 Total number of the Superior Court judges between provisional and permanent from 2001 to 2016 83
4.9.4 Total number of the First Instance Court judges between provisional and permanent from 2001 to 2016 84
4.9.5 Total number of the Court of peace judges between provisional and permanent from 2001 to 2016 86
CHAPTER 5:SUMMARY, IMPLICATIONS AND POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS 88
5.1 Introduction 88
5.2 Summary of the findings 88
5.3 Implications 92
5.4 Recommendations 94
CHAPTER 6:LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSION 98
6.1 Introduction 98
6.2 Research boundaries and limitations 98
6.3 Conclusion 99
BIBLIOGRAPHY 101
ABSTRACT IN KOREAN 143
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent1483471 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 행정대학원-
dc.subjectJudicial system-
dc.subjectcorruption-
dc.subjectprovisional judges-
dc.subjectpermanent judge-
dc.subjectPeru-
dc.subject.ddc350-
dc.titleCorruption in the Peruvian Judiciary: Focusing on the Provisional judges-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.contributor.affiliation행정대학원 행정학과-
dc.date.awarded2017-08-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share