Publications

Detailed Information

Two-Level Games between the Two Koreas -Political and Military Inter-Korean Talks, 2008~2017 - : 남북회담과 양면게임 이론 -2008~2017년 정치∙군사회담을 중심으로-

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor구민교-
dc.contributor.author강유진-
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-03T01:56:40Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-03T01:56:40Z-
dc.date.issued2018-08-
dc.identifier.other000000153334-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/144249-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 행정대학원 글로벌행정전공, 2018. 8. 구민교.-
dc.description.abstractThis study analyzes political and military Inter-Korean talks between the year of 2008 and 2017. Based on Putnams Two Level game theory, the winsets of each talks were thoroughly examined. According to Putnam, there are three factors that determines winset size-
dc.description.abstractthe distribution of power, preferences, and possible coalitions among Level 2 constituents, Level 2 political institutions, and Level 1 negotiators strategies.

Level 1 refers to negotiation itself and Level 2 is domestic society. In this study, three determinants were modified in the context of reality of Korean peninsula. Level 1 negotiators strategies refer to Level 1 negotiators autonomy, which includes the chief negotiators rank, position, and experience. Level 2 preferences and coalitions were analyzed by specific agendas in each talks. In addition, Level 2 political institutions were set as fixed variable.

In order to do the comprehensive analysis, the graph was introduced putting x-axis as Level 1 autonomy and y-axis as Level 2 preference and coalition. Inter-Korean talks for ten years were located on the graph. This graph shows that Level 1 is more influential than Level 2 in Inter-Korean talks. We also can find that the powerful chief negotiator can enlarge Level 2 winset, so he/she can achieve to make consensus even though when Level 2 winset is very small.
-
dc.description.tableofcontentsChapter 1. Introduction 1

1.1 Research Background

1.2 The Purpose of Research



Chapter 2. Theoretical Background 4

2.1 Literature Review

2.2 Two-Level game theory by Robert Putnam



Chapter 3. Analytical Framework 11



Chapter 4. Inter-Korean Talks 2008~2017 17

4.1 Inter-Korean Talks Overview

4.1.1 2008~2012: Working level talks on North Korean provocation

4.1.2 2013~2014: High-level talks to restore relationship

4.1.3 2015~2017: Brief success of high-level authoroties meeting



4.2 Winsets Analysis for Each Talks

4.2.1 Level 1: Chief negotiators autonomy

4.2.2 Level 2: preferences and coalitions

4.2.3 Level 2 institutions



Chapter 5. Political and Military Inter-Korean Talks 2008~2017 41

5.1. Analysis on winset in Inter-Korean Talks

5.2. Implications



Chapter 6. Conclusion 54

6.1 Evaluation

6.2 Talks in 2018 and Prospect

6.3 Future Research



Bibliography 59



Abstract in Korean 62
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subject.ddc351-
dc.titleTwo-Level Games between the Two Koreas -Political and Military Inter-Korean Talks, 2008~2017 --
dc.title.alternative남북회담과 양면게임 이론 -2008~2017년 정치∙군사회담을 중심으로--
dc.typeThesis-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorYujin Kang-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.contributor.affiliation행정대학원 글로벌행정전공-
dc.date.awarded2018-08-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share