Publications

Detailed Information

Volumetric lung nodule segmentation using adaptive ROI with multi-view residual learning

Cited 42 time in Web of Science Cited 55 time in Scopus
Authors

Usman, Muhammad; Lee, Byoung-Dai; Byon, Shi-Sub; Kim, Sung-Hyun; Lee, Byung-il; Shin, Yeong-Gil

Issue Date
2020-07
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
Citation
Scientific Reports, Vol.10 No.1, p. 12839
Abstract
Accurate quantification of pulmonary nodules can greatly assist the early diagnosis of lung cancer, enhancing patient survival possibilities. A number of nodule segmentation techniques, which either rely on a radiologist-provided 3-D volume of interest (VOI) or use the constant region of interests (ROIs) for all the slices, are proposed; however, these techniques can only investigate the presence of nodule voxels within the given VOI. Such approaches restrain the solutions to freely investigate the nodule presence outside the given VOI and also include the redundant structures (non-nodule) into VOI, which limits the segmentation accuracy. In this work, a novel semi-automated approach for 3-D segmentation of lung nodule in computerized tomography scans, has been proposed. The technique is segregated into two stages. In the first stage, a 2-D ROI containing the nodule is provided as an input to perform a patch-wise exploration along the axial axis using a novel adaptive ROI algorithm. This strategy enables the dynamic selection of the ROI in the surrounding slices to investigate the presence of nodules using a Deep Residual U-Net architecture. This stage provides the initial estimation of the nodule utilized to extract the VOI. In the second stage, the extracted VOI is further explored along the coronal and sagittal axes, in patchwise fashion, with Residual U-Nets. All the estimated masks are then fed into a consensus module to produce a final volumetric segmentation of the nodule. The algorithm is rigorously evaluated on LIDC-IDRI dataset, which is the largest publicly available dataset. The proposed approach achieved the average dice score of 87.5%, which is significantly higher than the existing state-of-the-art techniques.
ISSN
2045-2322
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/179307
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69817-y
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share