Publications

Detailed Information

Prevalence of and factors associated with inappropriate Clostridioides difficile testing in a teaching hospital in Korea

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorHee Bum Jo-
dc.contributor.authorSin Young Ham-
dc.contributor.authorJongtak Jung-
dc.contributor.authorSong Mi Moon-
dc.contributor.authorNak‑Hyun Kim-
dc.contributor.authorKyoung‑Ho Song-
dc.contributor.authorJeong Su Park-
dc.contributor.authorKyoung Un Park-
dc.contributor.authorEu Suk Kim-
dc.contributor.authorHong Bin Kim-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-18T05:10:04Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-18T05:10:04Z-
dc.date.issued2022-05-13-
dc.identifier.citationAntimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control. Vol 11(1):70ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn2047-2994-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/179861-
dc.description.abstractGiven the increasing incidence of Clostridioides difficile infections in Korea, there has been an increase in inappropriate testing for C. difficile, which has rendered overdiagnosis of asymptomatic colonisers common. We aimed to investigate the appropriateness of C. difficile testing and the related factors.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who were admitted to a 1300-bed tertiary-care teaching hospital in Korea and were tested for C. difficile infection from September 2019 to November 2019. We performed logistic regression analysis to investigate factors related to inappropriate testing. Further, a survey was conducted on physicians to assess the knowledge and ordering patterns of C. difficile testing.
We included 715 tests from 520 patients in the analysis. Testing was classified as hospital-onset and community-onset and subclassified as appropriate and inappropriate following an algorithmic method. Among the 715 tests, 576 (80.6%) and 139 (19.6%) tests were classified as hospital-onset and community-onset, respectively. Among the hospital-onset tests, 297 (52%) were considered inappropriate. The risk of inappropriate testing increased when C. difficile tests were conducted in the emergency room (OR 24.96; 95% CI 3.12–199.98) but decreased in intensive care units (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.19–0.67). The survey was conducted on 61 physicians. Internal medicine physicians had significantly higher scores than non-internal medicine physicians (7.1 vs. 5.7, p = 0.001). The most frequently ordered combination of tests was toxin + glutamate dehydrogenase (47.5%), which was consistent with the ordered tests.
Almost half of the C. difficile tests were performed inappropriately. The patient being located in the emergency room and intensive care unit increased and decreased the risk of inappropriate testing, respectively. In a questionnaire survey, we showed that internal medicine physicians were more knowledgeable about C. difficile testing than non-internal medicine physicians. There is a need to implement the diagnostic stewardship for C. difficile, especially through educational interventions for emergency room and non-internal medicine physicians.
ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherBMCko_KR
dc.subjectClostridium difficile-
dc.subjectDiarrhoea-
dc.subjectDiagnosis-
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires-
dc.titlePrevalence of and factors associated with inappropriate Clostridioides difficile testing in a teaching hospital in Koreako_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01111-0ko_KR
dc.citation.journaltitleAntimicrobial Resistance & Infection Controlko_KR
dc.language.rfc3066en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
dc.date.updated2022-05-15T04:25:39Z-
dc.citation.number1ko_KR
dc.citation.startpage70ko_KR
dc.citation.volume11ko_KR
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share